ARTICLE

Who's Scared of Babies? Pro-Choicers Cracking Up

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org February 17, 2016
Share this article:

Abortion is supposed to be about "planning parenthood," but recent outbursts from some pro-choicers makes it seem they find the very idea of human life appalling.


Take the kerfuffle over last Sundays Super Bowl commercials. The Doritos commercial featured a dad munching on the tasty chips while the couple sees their unborn baby on ultrasound. The baby wants Doritos too, so when the mom grabbed the chips and threw them across the room, the baby unexpectedly, well, gave chase. It was funny, if a little off-color.

But the National Abortion Rights Action League, or NARAL, felt differently. "#NotBuyingIt," the group tweeted. "that @Doritos ad using #antichoice tactic of humanizing fetuses & sexist tropes of dads as clueless & moms as uptight."

Well, I might grant them the sexist tropes, but humanizing fetuses? Really? What does NARAL think every pregnancy ultrasound shows? As Wilberforce Award recipient Dr. Robert George remarked on Facebook, Since...the fetus in the video was, by all accounts, a human fetus, the offspring of human parents, and not a bovine, canine, or feline fetus, its less than clear how [Doritos] is to blame for the humanization.

So why the outrage over a snack commercial? Well, as Russel Moore pointed out, the ultrasound itself has become a symbol of the pro-life movement. Seeing children in utero on that black-and-white screen isn't just an experience millions of parents cherish - it's also one thats convinced countless others not to have abortions. In fact, close to 80% of abortion-minded women who see their baby on ultrasound choose life. Ultrasound has been Gods technological gift to the pro-life movement and a threat to the abortion industrys bottom line.

But the culture of death wasn't finished lecturing Super Bowl advertisers. The NFL commemorated its 50th big game with joyous singing choirs of so-called Super Bowl babies. The opening caption read, "Data suggests 9 months after a Super Bowl victory, winning cities see a rise in births." In other words, celebrating a Super Bowl win was the impetus for conception.

Now some viewers probably blushed, but abortion supporters blew a gasket. "More Super Bowl babies?!?!" tweeted NARAL. "Get thee an IUD (or intrauterine contraceptive device)."

Wow. As David French responded sarcastically in National Review: "See all those smiling, happy children on the screen? Wouldn't the world be a better place if they didn't exist?" Thats what NARAL seemed to be saying.


But these commercials are only the latest chapter in this pro-abortion mood swing. Earlier this month, pro-abortion groups pointed angrily to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. According to researchers at the University of Texas, there was a slight uptick in the number of children born to low-income women in several Texas counties following the states decision to defund Planned Parenthood.

Cosmopolitan magazine tweeted with a frowny face emoji, "Texas women are having more babies since Planned Parenthood was defunded????" And the LA Times, Huffington Post, and other left-leaning media joined Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards in describing the birth of these children as "tragic."

Wait, babies are tragedies?

Making this reaction even more unsettling, Dr. Michael New writing at LifeNews points out that the Texas study was incredibly narrow, focused on just a handful of women on Medicaid in counties with Planned Parenthood clinics. The total increase in the number of births after Planned Parenthood was defunded? Thirty-seven.

As New writes, "This is not evidence of a public health crisis."

It is, however, evidence of a crisis in the pro-choice camp. Shouting at snack commercials and latching onto statistical anomalies is not how a strong, confident movement behaves. Its how a movement on the run behaves. For those of us who cherish and celebrate every life, its not exactly a touchdown. But it does mean were on offense, not on defense, anymore.

Copyright 2016 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Originally published at www.BreakPoint.org. Reposted with permission.


Other News

May 22, 2019On The Edge Of Disaster: Majority Of Americans Living Paycheck To Paycheck

When the next recession strikes, millions of Americans that suddenly lose their jobs could find themselves facing financial disaster almos...

May 22, 2019Iran's Proxy War Is The Real Problem

While a full-scale war with Iran does not appear likely in the near future, low-intensity conflict against the West and its allies already...

May 22, 2019What Progressives Actually Mean By "Tolerance"

Progressives conflate behaviors with people, and then demand that we stop condemning certain behaviors because that is hateful to the peop...

May 22, 2019'Born This Way' - The Zombie Arguments that Just Won't Die

The LGB movement has largely retired the "born this way" argument to make way for the "T"--transgender identity. So in place of "I was bor...

May 21, 2019Academic Battles: Statement Of Faith vs. Statement Of Diversity

Despite leftist academia condemning Christian schools and organizations for their statements of faith, they see no irony in enforcing stat...

May 21, 2019Transgender Identity May Have Cost A Baby Its Life

When it comes to checking into a hospital, how you identify does not matter. What matters is your biology and trying to fight this reality...

May 21, 2019Superbugs Are Killing Antibiotics: One Disease Away From Disaster

"We're looking to the shelf for the next antibiotic, and there's nothing there," says Erica Shenoy, associate chief of the infection contr...

Get Breaking News