Transanity - Transabled, Transracial & TransspeciesBy Michael Brown/Askdrbrown.org February 05, 2018
The question of being "transage" -- referring to someone who feels he or she is a child trapped in an adult's body -- was recently in the news with this shocking headline: "TRANS-AGE: Pedophile Charged With Abusing 3 Girls Says He's A 9-Year-Old Trapped In Man's Body."
Putting aside the inexcusable nature of this man's alleged crimes, he's hardly the first to make this claim. Consider the story of a married man with 7 children who now lives as a 6-year-old girl with his new adoptive "parents."
Then there are those who identify as "transabled." This headline explains: "Becoming disabled by choice, not chance: 'Transabled' people feel like impostors in their fully working bodies."
Then there are those who identity as transracial. Wikipedia defines this as individuals "who claim to have a racial identity that differs from their birth race," like Rachel Dolezal.
And then there are those who identify as transspecies, like the young woman who lives her life as a cat.
A story by Daniel Greenfield on Frontpage Magazine dating back to 2013 addressed this growing phenomenon. But, as Greenfield noted, the transgender community was not too happy with this.
And herein lies the problem. There is no more a test to prove that someone is (or is not) transgender than there's a test to prove that someone is (or is not) transabled, transracial, transage or transspecies. Where is the test? When are detailed neurological studies required before someone has sex-change surgery? When are chromosomal tests required before a child is put on puberty blockers or given hormones?
If it is far from ideal to mutilate healthy body parts to accommodate someone who identifies as transabled, then it is far from ideal to do the same for someone who identifies as transgender.
I've read transgender blog posts about people identifying as transspecies. On the one hand, the transgender community wants to be compassionate, recognizing the validity of what others perceive as reality. At the same time, not a few of them said, "But there's a big difference, since some of us really do have male brains in female bodies, but no human being has a leopard's brain or a wolf's brain."
But that raises the question: Where's the test? How do we differentiate the case of someone who identifies as transabled? What's the difference between a mind map telling someone that their left hand shouldn't be there, and someone who believes she's a woman trapped in a man's body?
Insanity as Identity
Greenfield had this to say: Insanity. It's not just a mental illness. It's also an identity. Men in dresses claim that gender is in the mind, not in the body. If you think you're a woman, then you are a woman. What used to be a minor form of eccentric insanity has now become educational policy in schools.
But why stop at gender when you can also do species? There are people who believe that their true identity is that of an animal. And who is to say that species isn't in the mind, just like gender is in the mind?
This isn't just a thought-experiment or satire. It's reality.
Species dysphoria is the equivalent of Gender dysphoria. Mentally ill persons with gender dysphoria are fashionably diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder. There is as of yet no Species Identity Disorder, but that is no doubt coming.
And, he notes, like those who identify as transgender, "Transpecies Americans create special pronouns for themselves and insist that refusing to pretend that they're cats or wolves is a hate crime."
Love Doesn't Do What's Easy
Do I write this to mock those who identify as transabled or transgender? Quite the contrary.
I write this to ask what makes transgender identity different from these other, deeply perceived identities, some of which have been documented to produce deep personal pain.
And if we can agree that it is far from ideal to mutilate healthy body parts to accommodate someone who identifies as transabled, then it is far from ideal to do the same for someone who identifies as transgender.
And if we can agree that it is far from loving to affirm someone's false sense of reality -- like Rachel Dolezal -- than we can agree to continue to work towards finding positive cures for transgenderism rather than affirming Bruce as Caitlyn.
It's easy to affirm, but love doesn't always do what's easy. This is a call for sanity as much as a call for love.