ARTICLE

Who's Scared of Babies? Pro-Choicers Cracking Up

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org February 17, 2016
Share this article:

Abortion is supposed to be about "planning parenthood," but recent outbursts from some pro-choicers makes it seem they find the very idea of human life appalling.


Take the kerfuffle over last Sundays Super Bowl commercials. The Doritos commercial featured a dad munching on the tasty chips while the couple sees their unborn baby on ultrasound. The baby wants Doritos too, so when the mom grabbed the chips and threw them across the room, the baby unexpectedly, well, gave chase. It was funny, if a little off-color.

But the National Abortion Rights Action League, or NARAL, felt differently. "#NotBuyingIt," the group tweeted. "that @Doritos ad using #antichoice tactic of humanizing fetuses & sexist tropes of dads as clueless & moms as uptight."

Well, I might grant them the sexist tropes, but humanizing fetuses? Really? What does NARAL think every pregnancy ultrasound shows? As Wilberforce Award recipient Dr. Robert George remarked on Facebook, Since...the fetus in the video was, by all accounts, a human fetus, the offspring of human parents, and not a bovine, canine, or feline fetus, its less than clear how [Doritos] is to blame for the humanization.

So why the outrage over a snack commercial? Well, as Russel Moore pointed out, the ultrasound itself has become a symbol of the pro-life movement. Seeing children in utero on that black-and-white screen isn't just an experience millions of parents cherish - it's also one thats convinced countless others not to have abortions. In fact, close to 80% of abortion-minded women who see their baby on ultrasound choose life. Ultrasound has been Gods technological gift to the pro-life movement and a threat to the abortion industrys bottom line.

But the culture of death wasn't finished lecturing Super Bowl advertisers. The NFL commemorated its 50th big game with joyous singing choirs of so-called Super Bowl babies. The opening caption read, "Data suggests 9 months after a Super Bowl victory, winning cities see a rise in births." In other words, celebrating a Super Bowl win was the impetus for conception.

Now some viewers probably blushed, but abortion supporters blew a gasket. "More Super Bowl babies?!?!" tweeted NARAL. "Get thee an IUD (or intrauterine contraceptive device)."

Wow. As David French responded sarcastically in National Review: "See all those smiling, happy children on the screen? Wouldn't the world be a better place if they didn't exist?" Thats what NARAL seemed to be saying.


But these commercials are only the latest chapter in this pro-abortion mood swing. Earlier this month, pro-abortion groups pointed angrily to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. According to researchers at the University of Texas, there was a slight uptick in the number of children born to low-income women in several Texas counties following the states decision to defund Planned Parenthood.

Cosmopolitan magazine tweeted with a frowny face emoji, "Texas women are having more babies since Planned Parenthood was defunded????" And the LA Times, Huffington Post, and other left-leaning media joined Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards in describing the birth of these children as "tragic."

Wait, babies are tragedies?

Making this reaction even more unsettling, Dr. Michael New writing at LifeNews points out that the Texas study was incredibly narrow, focused on just a handful of women on Medicaid in counties with Planned Parenthood clinics. The total increase in the number of births after Planned Parenthood was defunded? Thirty-seven.

As New writes, "This is not evidence of a public health crisis."

It is, however, evidence of a crisis in the pro-choice camp. Shouting at snack commercials and latching onto statistical anomalies is not how a strong, confident movement behaves. Its how a movement on the run behaves. For those of us who cherish and celebrate every life, its not exactly a touchdown. But it does mean were on offense, not on defense, anymore.

Copyright 2016 by the Colson Center for Christian Worldview. Originally published at www.BreakPoint.org. Reposted with permission.




Other News

October 01, 2026America’s Last Soldier Has Left Iraq - But Is Babylon’s Story Just Beginning?

After more than two decades of American military involvement, the final U.S. forces have departed Iraq. But for students of Bible prophecy...

October 01, 2026Experts: American Church Must Wake Up to Dangers of Islam

America's growing embrace of politicized Islam is "perplexing" to those with first-hand experience of its oppressive system, confessed Pas...

October 01, 2026Britain’s Quiet Revival? Young Men Are Defying The Secular Trend

A major new study of evangelical Christianity in the United Kingdom has uncovered a remarkably different demographic picture - one that is...

October 01, 2026Outcry Grows over Canada’s 100,000 and Counting 'Assistance in Dying' Killings

Following the death of a beloved grandmother who was killed without her consent through Canada's government-run assisted suicide program, ...

September 30, 2026Seven Economic Warning Signs Every American Should Be Watching Right Now

America is entering a period in which several economic warning signs are flashing at the same time. None of them, by itself, proves that a...

September 30, 2026The Interfaith Gospel: When Religious Unity Comes At The Expense Of Truth

There is a difference between respecting another person's beliefs and presenting contradictory religious claims as though they are complem...

September 30, 2026The Pick-And-Choose Bible: A Generation Wants Scripture Without Its Authority

Young Americans appear increasingly interested in the Bible. But reading Scripture and submitting to Scripture are not necessarily the sam...

Get Breaking News