ARTICLE

Parents Fight Back Against Kids Trans Surgeries Without Their Knowledge

News Image By Tony Perkins/Family Research Council February 11, 2020
Share this article:

"It's an absolute nightmare for a mother to live through." Elaine Davidson's voice shook as she talked. "I found out about the surgeries after the fact," she says haltingly. It was social media, she explained, where she first saw the photo of her daughter's chest -- bloody bandages covering the places where her breasts had been cut off. 

Elaine's daughter was 17. She had a double mastectomy and hysterectomy without her parents ever knowing -- and without a single psychologist signing off.


In Oregon, Elaine says, kids as young as 14 can make this same decision without ever calling home. "These surgeries are done on an outpatient basis, which only required a few visits to a therapist with a master's in social work. 

No psychologist, no psychiatrist, no years of therapy like many people think." And these young, innocent bodies, she struggles to explain, are "permanently marred." "This is a very, very mutilating surgery."

"I had previously raised concern to a therapist that I believe she's on the autism spectrum. And I still do. But they dismissed it and instead just really pushed her toward medical transition. And I found out about the surgeries after the fact." 

When her daughter decided to have a phalloplasty, Elaine started to cry. "I flew to Portland twice. I begged everyone I could. I begged her. I couldn't stop it. All I could do was be there for her."

She watched, helplessly, as her daughter changed the course of her life forever. And she is determined that no parent should ever have to suffer that agony without a say again. 


She joined the Kelsey Coalition, a movement of parents from all across the political spectrum, who are pleading with schools, lawmakers, and doctors to stop pushing children into a lifestyle they can never escape. "I'm speaking out because I love my daughter... She has been a victim of 'gender affirming' medical procedures, and I was powerless to stop doctors from harming her."

"Why we are letting children make life-altering, permanent, irreversible decisions about their bodies and about their health when we have enough sense not to let them get tattoos until they're 18 or drink until they're 21?" Elaine wants to know. 

She, like the rest of the Kelsey Coalition, has been asking this question in South Dakota, where the first-ever bill to put an age restriction on gender transition surgery and treatments is moving through the legislature. "I think this law in South Dakota is a good start," she agrees. "Sixteen, though, is still extremely young..."

At this point, though, states need to start somewhere. And South Dakota's Vulnerable Child Protection Act is a commonsense law that would make it illegal to mutilate gender-confused children. It's time, Elaine insists, to help children "learn to love the bodies in which they were born. 


Isn't that what the body-positivity movement is all about? Transgender-identifying children need our compassion, and they need our help. They need responsible adults to gently question their beliefs, not blindly affirm them. They need proper therapy and guidance, not drugs and surgeries."

Let's hope South Dakota's leaders agree. Although the bill passed the state house and is headed to the senate, the measure could be in jeopardy because of Governor Kristi Noem (R). Although she hasn't publicly opposed the bill, the governor has said that she has concerned about the proposal -- which could be a signal to senate leaders to stop the bill from progressing. 

Since South Dakota's efforts have implications nationwide, I encourage you to contact Governor Noem's office and urge her to stop this medical experimentation on children! 

Sad Article Update: South Dakota's Vulnerable Child Protection Act failed to gain enough support today in a state Senate committee. The Republican-controlled Health and Human Services Committee voted 5-2 to move HB 1057 "to the 41st legislative day," effectively killing the proposal, as the annual session is limited to 40 days.

Originally published at Family Research Council - reposted with permission.




Other News

November 05, 2025When Politicians Talk About Demons: The Rising Debate Over UFOs

In recent months, public fascination with UFOs and extraterrestrials has taken an unexpected turn--from late-night talk shows to the halls...

November 05, 2025A Welcome Correction: Vatican Backs Away From Mary’s Role In Salvation

In a new doctrinal decree approved by Pope Leo, the Vatican officially instructed Catholics not to refer to Mary as the "co-redeemer" of h...

November 05, 2025If This Canadian Liberal MP Gets The Chance, He's Coming For Your Bibles

Liberal Member of Parliament Marc Miller is the chair of the House Justice Committee, and last week he wondered whether Canada's Criminal ...

November 05, 2025Hezbollah Seeks To Take Over Lebanon Politically As It Rearms Against Israel

Hezbollah is pursuing a political strategy to take over the Lebanese parliament, and the Lebanese state is largely helpless in stopping it...

November 04, 2025America's Economic Fault Line - The Five Cracks That Could Reshape Everything

While everyone’s attention is fixed on the government impasse over the budget and food stamp funding, there’s a much deeper issue brewing ...

November 04, 2025The Trojan Horse Of Age Verification: From Safety To Surveillance & Control

The idea sounds innocent enough-protect children online. Who could possibly argue with that? Age verification tools, after all, promise to...

November 04, 2025'Dear Hockey: Goodbye' - Another Female Athlete Stands Up Against Transgenderism

After 20 years of professional hockey, Rachel Stoneberg is quitting -- not because she wanted to retire, but because she refuses to compet...

Get Breaking News