ARTICLE

Parents Fight Back Against Kids Trans Surgeries Without Their Knowledge

News Image By Tony Perkins/Family Research Council February 11, 2020
Share this article:

"It's an absolute nightmare for a mother to live through." Elaine Davidson's voice shook as she talked. "I found out about the surgeries after the fact," she says haltingly. It was social media, she explained, where she first saw the photo of her daughter's chest -- bloody bandages covering the places where her breasts had been cut off. 

Elaine's daughter was 17. She had a double mastectomy and hysterectomy without her parents ever knowing -- and without a single psychologist signing off.


In Oregon, Elaine says, kids as young as 14 can make this same decision without ever calling home. "These surgeries are done on an outpatient basis, which only required a few visits to a therapist with a master's in social work. 

No psychologist, no psychiatrist, no years of therapy like many people think." And these young, innocent bodies, she struggles to explain, are "permanently marred." "This is a very, very mutilating surgery."

"I had previously raised concern to a therapist that I believe she's on the autism spectrum. And I still do. But they dismissed it and instead just really pushed her toward medical transition. And I found out about the surgeries after the fact." 

When her daughter decided to have a phalloplasty, Elaine started to cry. "I flew to Portland twice. I begged everyone I could. I begged her. I couldn't stop it. All I could do was be there for her."

She watched, helplessly, as her daughter changed the course of her life forever. And she is determined that no parent should ever have to suffer that agony without a say again. 


She joined the Kelsey Coalition, a movement of parents from all across the political spectrum, who are pleading with schools, lawmakers, and doctors to stop pushing children into a lifestyle they can never escape. "I'm speaking out because I love my daughter... She has been a victim of 'gender affirming' medical procedures, and I was powerless to stop doctors from harming her."

"Why we are letting children make life-altering, permanent, irreversible decisions about their bodies and about their health when we have enough sense not to let them get tattoos until they're 18 or drink until they're 21?" Elaine wants to know. 

She, like the rest of the Kelsey Coalition, has been asking this question in South Dakota, where the first-ever bill to put an age restriction on gender transition surgery and treatments is moving through the legislature. "I think this law in South Dakota is a good start," she agrees. "Sixteen, though, is still extremely young..."

At this point, though, states need to start somewhere. And South Dakota's Vulnerable Child Protection Act is a commonsense law that would make it illegal to mutilate gender-confused children. It's time, Elaine insists, to help children "learn to love the bodies in which they were born. 


Isn't that what the body-positivity movement is all about? Transgender-identifying children need our compassion, and they need our help. They need responsible adults to gently question their beliefs, not blindly affirm them. They need proper therapy and guidance, not drugs and surgeries."

Let's hope South Dakota's leaders agree. Although the bill passed the state house and is headed to the senate, the measure could be in jeopardy because of Governor Kristi Noem (R). Although she hasn't publicly opposed the bill, the governor has said that she has concerned about the proposal -- which could be a signal to senate leaders to stop the bill from progressing. 

Since South Dakota's efforts have implications nationwide, I encourage you to contact Governor Noem's office and urge her to stop this medical experimentation on children! 

Sad Article Update: South Dakota's Vulnerable Child Protection Act failed to gain enough support today in a state Senate committee. The Republican-controlled Health and Human Services Committee voted 5-2 to move HB 1057 "to the 41st legislative day," effectively killing the proposal, as the annual session is limited to 40 days.

Originally published at Family Research Council - reposted with permission.




Other News

March 23, 2026A Nation Divided: Shocking Poll Reveals UK Muslim Support For Iran

What happens when a significant portion of a nation sees the world through a completely different moral and geopolitical lens--especially ...

March 23, 2026It's Billy Graham's Fault: Christian Progressives Find New Target For Blame

Lutheran minister, Iowa representative, and now congressional candidate Sarah Trone Garriott (D) has blamed deceased evangelist Billy Grah...

March 23, 2026AI Bias In Action: When Machines Quietly Shape What We Trust

A troubling reminder surfaced this week that artificial intelligence is not the neutral referee many assume it to be--it is, in fact, a re...

March 23, 2026Why Israel Still Has Babies And The Western World Has Stopped

According to Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics, the Jewish fertility rate currently stands at 3.09 births per woman. Israel isn't just...

March 21, 2026Are We On The Brink Of A Major Escalation In Our War With Iran?

Instead of backing down, it appears that both sides are preparing to take the showdown in the Middle East to the next level....

March 21, 2026Experts Warn of Homegrown Jihadism And Spread Of Sharia Law

As terrorist attacks perpetrated by Islamist extremists continue to proliferate across the U.S., experts and lawmakers are raising the ala...

March 21, 2026Unthinkable: Britain Advances Law For Abortion Up To Birth

This week, the House of Lords advanced legislation that pro-life leaders are calling not just controversial, but catastrophic. Once a soc...

Get Breaking News