The Growing Use Of Social Credit Scores To Reward/Punish Citizens

By now many of our readers are aware of the ongoing rollout of a nationwide social credit system in China. Starting in 2009, the Chinese government began testing a national reputation system based on a citizen's economic and social reputation, or "social credit." 

This social credit score can be used to reward or punish certain behaviors. The idea is that the state can give or takeaway points from a social credit score in order to engineer good behavior from the people. 

By late 2019, Chinese citizens were losing points on their score for dishonest and fraudulent financial behavior, playing loud music, eating on public transportation, jaywalking, running red lights, failing to appear at doctor appointments, missing job interviews or hotel reservations without canceling, and incorrectly sorting waste. 

To raise one's social credit score a Chinese citizen can donate blood, donate to an approved charity, volunteer for community service, and other activities approved by the government. The Chinese government has begun to deny millions of people the ability to purchase plane and high-speed rail tickets due to low social credit scores and being labeled "untrustworthy."

While most people are likely familiar with this concept because of the popular show Black Mirror, the truth is this practice is much more reality than fiction. 

According to a new report from cybersecurity experts Kaspersky, 32 percent of adults between 25 to 34 have had issues getting a mortgage or loan due to their social media activity. The denial of loans comes as part of "social scoring systems" which are being used at an alarming rate by government and businesses to determine customers or citizens "trustworthiness."

"Based on these scores, systems make decisions for us or about us, from travel destinations and the associated costs, to whether we are allowed to access the service itself," the report states.

Kaspersky surveyed more than 10,000 people from 21 countries and found that 18 percent of those polled had issues accessing financial services because of assessments of their social media data. The report notes that more than 4.5 billion people use the internet around the world, and 3.8 billion have social media accounts. 

These accounts provide governments and companies with thousands of data points to score people. Less than half of those surveyed said they have heard of social scoring or social credit. As few as 13 percent of those polled in Austria and Germany said they were familiar with the concepts, while 71 percent in China were familiar.

Unfortunately, the survey also found that 67 percent of people are willing to share their profiles to secure online shopping discounts and 52 percent are willing if it means skipping lines at airports and other means of travel. 

Finally, 51 percent of people said they are fine with government monitoring their social media behavior if it means keeping the public safe. The post-9/11 indoctrination appears to have worked to an astounding degree.

Kaspersky warned that the public has little protections when it comes to their social media data, stating, "there is no framework we are publicly aware of when it comes to other systems used by organizations and governments to collect our data." 

Further, the report states that consumers "can find it impossible to find out what their scores are, how these scores are being calculated and how they can be corrected if there are inaccuracies."

Chengyi Lin, a professor of strategy at the INSEAD business school, told EuroNews she believes, "you're gonna have a holistic view of your behaviours, both financial and digital, and even physical, to give you a single credit score."

Lin's comments point to an ever-increasing centralization of data and the push towards a single score by which governments will rate their populations. When combined with facial recognition, biometrics at the airports, CCTV cameras, drones and surveillance planes flying above major cities -- it is clear that the Technocratic State is coming into full view.

Clearly, the majority of people are completely in the dark about these programs and their dangerous implications. Therefore, the goal for those "in the know" should be to spread the word and warn as many people as possible. 

We must also take personal responsibility for the amount of data we voluntarily share with social media sites, apps, and the internet in general. The only defense against the complete erosion of privacy -- and thus liberty -- is an educated public who stands up for their own rights.

Originally published at Activist Post - reposted with permission.