ARTICLE

Shocking Study Shows Majority Of Belgian Doctors Would Support Infanticide

News Image By Jonathon Van Maren/Bridgehead.ca October 05, 2020
Share this article:

On August 2, a new study titled "Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards termination of pregnancy at viable stage" was released, analyzing the willingness of physicians to commit late-term abortions or even infanticide. The study, funded by the Research Foundation Flanders and Ghent University, found that 89.1% of medical professionals and 93.6% of physicians indicated that infanticide is acceptable in certain circumstances. 

The findings are based on the results of an anonymous survey sent to 117 Belgian medical professionals who worked in Neonatal Intensive Care in Flanders, Belgium. There were 92 responses on a range of questions, but the most disturbing finding is that a near-total majority of physicians backed killing newborn infants with disabilities by lethal injection. From the study:


Of all healthcare professionals, 89.1% (93.6% of physicians) agree that in the event of a serious (non-lethal) neonatal condition, administering drugs with the explicit intention to end neonatal life is acceptable. About the same proportion (87.9%) agrees that Belgian law should be changed to make this possible.

These numbers are genuinely staggering. Nearly all physicians--at least in the Flanders area of Belgium--support not just late-term abortion, which is controversial even amongst those who consider themselves "pro-choice," but actual infanticide. 

Further to that, they believe infanticide should be an option when the baby's condition is "non-lethal"--in short, utilized as eugenics in cases where they believe the baby's life is worthless. Doctors and medical professionals would like Belgium to decriminalize killing newborn babies who are disabled or have other conditions. According to the study's conclusion: 


Healthcare professionals practicing late TOP in Flanders, Belgium have a high degree of tolerance towards late TOP [termination of pregnancy], irrespective of sociodemographic factors, and are demanding legislative change regarding active life‐ending in the fetal and neonatal periods. Further research should explore the correlation of attitudes to late TOP with actual medical decisions taken in daily clinical practice.

Additionally, a full 100% of doctors supported late-term abortion in the case of "lethal fetal conditions" and 95.6% supported late-term abortion when the condition of the baby was "serious." If the baby is entirely healthy, the numbers drop significantly: 19.8% of respondents supported late-term abortion for "maternal psychological problems" and only 13.2% supported late-term abortion in the case of "maternal socio-economic problems." 

Additionally, the study found that "behavioral intentions indicate that even in situations with an unclear diagnosis and unpredictable prognosis, 85.6% of professionals would still consider late TOP." Despite the rhetoric of abortion activists who claim that late-term abortion virtually never happens and that when it does, the child is nearly always has a fatal condition, a super-majority of medical professionals support both late-term abortion and infanticide for conditions in which the child does not have a fatal condition.

Unfortunately, a society that accepts abortion must inevitably support some forms of infanticide, as well. 


After all, there is no material difference between killing a child in the womb and killing a child shortly after he or she has exited the womb--especially not to the child. In fact, infanticide is often much less messy when compared to going in blind with tools to dismember a child in the womb - one can simply give them an injection in the heart once they have exited the womb, and death will be nearly immediate. 

And if there's nothing morally wrong with killing a baby on one side of the birth canal, what is so wrong about killing that same baby on the other side? That is a question that abortion supporters have long struggled to answer--and now, it seems, many physicians are simply following their ideology to its logical conclusions. 

Originally published at The Bridgehead - reposted with permission.




Other News

December 27, 2025Preparing To Stand Alone: Israel's Strategic & Prophetic Shift

For nearly eight decades, the U.S.-Israel bond has been one of modern history's most remarkable partnerships. But something profound is h...

December 27, 2025Pharmakeia: America's Seniors Are Being Overmedicated Into Oblivion

We are the most drugged nation that the world has ever seen, and this is particularly true for our seniors. The proportion of our seniors ...

December 27, 2025The Verse That Defined 2025 & The Generation Turning Back To God

If you wanted to understand the spiritual condition of 2025, you wouldn't need a poll, a think tank, or a political forecast. You could si...

December 27, 2025A Prophetic Call Home: Why Israel Is Urging Jews Worldwide To Return

Against the backdrop of rising antisemitism and growing global instability, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar has issued a call that e...

December 24, 2025Light In The Darkness: Redeeming Technology To Tell The Greatest Story Ever Told

In Manvel, Texas, just south of Houston, The Church on Masters Road decided not to retreat from technology-but to redeem it. What unfolded...

December 24, 2025The Rich Theology Of Christmas Carols

These songs remind us of essential Christmas truths: that this world belongs to God, that our plight of sin is not wholly lost, that the w...

December 24, 2025New York's Surrender To Euthanasia: Glorifying Suicide In The Name of Compassion

Countries like Canada, Switzerland, and Germany have already slid into a dystopian nightmare, offering state-sponsored death to the disabl...

Get Breaking News