ARTICLE

Left Leaning Evangelicals Launch 'Pro-Life Evangelicals For Biden'

News Image By Jonathon Van Maren/Bridgehead.ca October 08, 2020
Share this article:

A group of prominent evangelical leaders has just launched a statement on behalf of a "movement" they are referring to as "Pro-Life Evangelicals for Biden." 

With signatories including Richard Mouw, president emeritus of Fuller Seminary; Jerusha Duford, Billy Graham's granddaughter; and John Huffman, the board chair emeritus of Christianity Today, the statement calls on evangelicals who oppose the destruction of pre-born babies in the womb to vote for someone who has committed to an expansion of abortion rights unprecedented in American history. 

The statement begins with a cursory repudiation of Biden's position: "As pro-life evangelicals, we disagree with Vice President Biden and the Democratic platform on the issue of abortion." However: "We believe a biblically shaped commitment to the sanctity of life compels us to a consistent ethic of life that affirms the sanctity of human life from beginning to end." 


For this reason, the signatories posit, abortion should not be a primary concern since "many things that good political decisions could change destroy persons created in the image of God and violate the sanctity of human life. Poverty kills millions every year. So does lack of healthcare and smoking. Racism kills. Unless we quickly make major changes, devastating climate change will kill tens of millions. Poverty, lack of accessible health care services, smoking, racism and climate change are all pro-life issues."

The signatories then insinuate that "Democratic proposals" would reduce the abortion rate (Dr. Michael New effectively debunked the deceit that abortion rates go down due to Democratic presidents last month), and explain that according to the National Association of Evangelicals' official public policy document: "'Faithful evangelical civic engagement and witness must champion a biblically balanced agenda.' 

Therefore we oppose 'one issue' political thinking because it lack biblical balance...For these reasons, we believe that on balance, Joe Biden's policies are more consistent with the biblically shaped ethic of life than those of Donald Trump. Therefore, even as we continue to urge different policies on abortion, we urge evangelicals to elect Joe Biden as president."

The number of problems with this statement is staggering. To start, the signatories confuse intrinsic evils--like intentionally dismembering a developing human being in the womb--with contingent evils. The entire statement also reveals that regardless of what they are attempting to convey, the signatories simply do not take abortion seriously and do not actually present abortion for what it is. 


If abortion is the direct and intentional destruction of a vulnerable and helpless human being created in God's image, what could possibly excuse voting for someone who supports that act? 

For example, these evangelicals state that not to vote for Biden over his support for destroying babies in the womb (as well as his commitment to repeal the Hyde Amendment, which has saved 2.4 million lives thus far) is essentially legalistic and not "biblically balanced." 

But to understand the extent to which these evangelicals are dismissing the value of the pre-born, ask yourself this: Would they apply the same standard to any other group? What if the Democratic Party was committed to alleviating poverty, fighting climate change, pacifism, and a laundry list of other policies--but supported the killing of a minority group as well?

Would the same justifications apply? If the Democratic Platform supported killing indigenous people, or African Americans, or immigrants the way they support killing pre-born children in the womb, would we be told that "on balance," they were still more pro-life than the party who opposed killing those people? 

Would we be told that it was morally permissible to vote for the party that supported decapitating one subset of the population at will because that party was really opposed to smoking and pollution and were in favor of improving economic conditions to the point that many people wouldn't feel the need to kill other people anymore? I suspect not. 


I suspect that this is a position that only applies to the killing of the pre-born--which says a lot about what the signatories of this statement think about the pre-born. I've held the corpses of dead babies in my hands, and I've looked them in the face--and I can't pretend that voting for someone who advocated for the right to kill those children is a moral option. It simply is not.

It is also extremely revealing that the signatories of this statement actually posit a moral equivalence between abortion and smoking or climate change. This is just transparent nonsense, and shows a genuine lack of understanding about what abortion really is. 

I would encourage those claiming this moral equivalence to go online and watch a video of an abortion procedure. It will disabuse you of such notions very quickly. It should also banish the idea that we can vote for someone who believes it is a social good that older human beings have the right to kill younger human beings in a grotesque and barbaric fashion because that person has a few other policies that we like. 

It is sadly ironic that this statement from "pro-life evangelicals" comes out just as Joe Biden has announced that if Amy Coney Barrett is confirmed to the Supreme Court and Roe v. Wade is overturned, he'll enshrine Roe in statute and make it "the law of the land." 

But hey--Biden doesn't like poverty. Let that distract your attention from the corpses of 65 million dead babies that litter this land as a result of Roe--and vote for the man who promises it will never end on his watch.

Originally published at The Bridgehead - reposted with permission.




Other News

October 31, 2020The Final Prophecies

Picture this: It’s midway through the Seven-Year Tribulation Period and the Jews are performing animal sacrifices in their rebuilt third t...

October 29, 2020Preparing For The National Meltdown No Matter Who Wins

With just a shot time left until Election Day, most Americans that really care about politics are pacified because they believe that a pos...

October 29, 2020China's President Urges Soldiers To Prepare For War - But Has It Already Begun?

It may surprise many readers that the Chinese President would be so bold as to suggest that war is on the horizon but China has been playi...

October 29, 2020More Christian Facebook Pages Come Under Censorship For Biblical Worldview

Some of the complaints against Facebook involve subtle discrimination -- what shows up in someone's news feed for example. But this week, ...

October 29, 2020Can Combined Christian-Jewish Vote Pack A Punch For Trump?

Is the Jewish vote a lost cause for U.S. President Donald Trump? Not if Jews and Christians are grouped in the same constituency, says New...

October 27, 2020The First Post-Christian Generation Is Coming - And It Will Transform America

Those promising a bright American future are simply not looking at the data. Western civilization--not just the United States--is on the b...

October 27, 2020Three Things Americans Are Doing To Prepare For Election Chaos & Covid 2nd Wave

As we approach the end of 2020, a "perfect storm" of circumstances is causing the anxiety level of many Americans to go through the roof, ...

Get Breaking News