ARTICLE

Next In The Queue: Polyamory Movement Demands Acceptance

News Image By Jonathon Van Maren/Bridgehead.ca December 26, 2020
Share this article:

Pro-family activists said that polygamy and polyamory would be next in the queue after marriage was redefined by Obergefell, and everything is unfolding right on schedule. 

The pattern is familiar. First, personal stories are employed in a willing media eager to cover the next weird thing, exploiting instinctive empathy and beginning the process of normalization. Children are usually involved and utilized as evidence that legal recognition of alternative family arrangements are necessary. 

Finally, the courts cave, predictably announcing that they are only recognizing an already-existing reality rather than making a substantial change.


Exhibit A is a story out of California. Back in 2017, a "throuple" of men successfully petitioned a judge to put all three of them on the birth certificate of a little girl named Piper. Dr. Ian Jenkins and Alan Mayfield met in 2003, and added another partner to their relationship upon meeting Jeremy Hodges, a zoo-keeper, in 2012. 

They discussed having children--the media reports on this ignore the fact that obviously, men cannot create children without women. But children have been turned into a commodity, and our society has decided that gay men have more of a right to children than children have a right to mothers.

As The Daily Mail grotesquely put it: "They were offered embryos by a female friend, Meghan." The men had been given children, and now they needed to rent a womb. As the Mail put it, "a different friend offered to be the surrogate for the embryos, and they paid for many lawyers, Piper was born, followed several years later by Parker." 

Now, the three men just needed legal recognition for their arrangement and appealed to a San Diego judge to be recognized as three fathers. The judge initially refused, stating that she couldn't unilaterally establish a new precedent.


According to Jenkins, "Alan went 'full mama bear.' He basically interrupted the proceedings and told them to swear us all in. We all gave very tearful testimonies about why we needed to become parents. You could see the emotion on the judge's face. 

She looked at all the options in front of her and found a way to use existing laws to give us the first birth certificate of its kind anywhere." This, predictably, has been hailed as a landmark loophole for polyamorous throuples and a potential path to legal recognition for a variety of arrangements. 

The men now have a book coming out next March, written by Ian Jenkins, titled Three Dads and a Baby (a riff on the title of the 1987 comedy Three Men and a Baby.) The book explains how Ian is called 'papa,' Alan is 'dada,' and Jeremy is "daddy," and Jenkins calls their arrangement "just three tame, regular people who spend a lot of time talking about what to have for dinner." In short? 

Their family is just like yours, only with no Mama or Mommy--just men. But if Jenkins is to be believed, mothers don't do anything a father can't do. Men and women are simply interchangeable. 

The point of the new book, of course, is to persuade as all that three dads and no moms is great for kids. According to the Mail: "Ian said they also wanted to raise awareness of the need for more legal rights for polyamorous families...'I really worry about someone who lives somewhere that's not as accepting as California and wants to live this kind of life and can't move,' he said. 


'Some states are just brutal. They make every effort to impair parenting by nontraditional families and are really unhelpful. I'm hoping this starts the wheels turning that families come in lots of different arrangements.'"

Three Men and a Baby, no doubt, will promptly be turned into an acclaimed documentary or move with rave reviews in all the right publications. We will be informed that only bigots believe that children need mothers, and that to even insinuate such a thing is shocking and outrageous. 

We will be told that denying children mothers by celebrating family arrangements where children are raised by groups of men is a sign of progress. And when the children tell us otherwise, decades down the road, it will be too late to make a difference.

Originally published at the Bridgehead - reposted with permission.




Other News

December 18, 2025The Boast That Should Alarm America: Newsom's Trans Agenda And The Road To 2028

Newsom is widely viewed as the overwhelming favorite for the Democratic nomination in 2028. If California has been a laboratory for progre...

December 18, 2025Bible Prophecy & The Largest Planetary Defense Drill In History

Across the globe, a quiet but historic exercise is underway as comet 3I/Atlas approaches this Friday-one that reveals both humanity's rema...

December 18, 2025Why Christmas Remains The Church's Greatest Opportunity To Spread Its Message

Nearly 47% of Americans say they typically attend church during the Christmas season, including one in five religiously unaffiliated Ameri...

December 18, 2025Who Will the Peacekeepers Really Watch In Gaza? Israel Has Reason To Worry

We have seen this movie before, and it ended badly. The United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon was tasked with ensuring peace and disarmi...

December 16, 2025The EU's Plan To Read Your Messages - All Of Them

The automatic scan of private content (texts, images, videos) sent through messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram, or prompts s...

December 15, 2025Alone In The Crowd: The Holiday Struggle With Loneliness And Depression

Even though we are more "connected" to one another through the Internet in this day and age, the truth is that we are more isolated than e...

December 15, 2025Welcome To Socialism: Why Nicaragua Is Afraid Of The Bible

The Bible presents a fundamental problem for socialist and communist systems: it recognizes a higher authority than the state....

Get Breaking News