Microsoft 365 GCC High and Compliance
ByThe modern world evolves at a terrifying pace,
with new threats to cybersecurity appearing on a widespread basis. This is a
significant problem for the world as a whole – and an even bigger problem for
defense industries with higher demands regarding data sensitivity and
information security. The demand for comprehensive collaboration platforms with
sophisticated data protection measures is at an all-time high, expecting a
combination of security, compliance, and data management in a single package.
This is where Microsoft 365 Government
Community Cloud High (GCC High) comes into play, offering a robust solution
tailored to these specific needs. Microsoft 365 GCC High is a crucial
advancement in cloud computing, designed to cater to the unique needs of government
agencies, contractors, and organizations dealing with controlled unclassified
information (CUI). With its strong feature set and strict security measures,
Microsoft 365 GCC High provides a secure collaborative environment that allows
public sector entities to fully leverage cloud technology without compromising
data protection or compliance.
Microsoft 365 comes in four different versions:
The most comprehensive option is the original
Microsoft 365, known as "Commercial," which is widely used by
enterprise customers. The other versions have fewer features to ensure they
meet strict compliance and security standards required by government, defense,
and the defense industrial base (DIB).
Microsoft 365 GCC High serves as a middle
ground between the less restrictive GCC solution and the highly rigorous
Microsoft 365 DoD solution. It's specifically designed for organizations in the
Defense Industrial Base (DIB) that require a cloud service compliant with
regulations like ITAR and EAR, mandating that all data stays within the U.S.
borders and is supported by vetted U.S. personnel.
Microsoft 365 GCC High is built on Azure
Government and adheres to multiple compliance frameworks such as FedRAMP High,
NIST 800-171, CMMC L1-3, and CUI on behalf of the Government, along with DISA
IL 5, among others. However, it does sacrifice some features available in GCC.
For instance, Cloud App Security and Microsoft Defender ATP have reduced
functionality in GCC High, and features like Compliance Manager and Calling
Plans are unavailable.
The reasons for omitting certain features and
apps from Microsoft 365 GCC High are as follows:
DoD contractors face various compliance
requirements, which differ depending on whether they use M365 Commercial,
Government, or DoD versions. For instance, all four versions of Microsoft 365
can meet CMMC 1 and FCI compliance requirements. However, for the more
stringent CMMC 2.0 compliance or when handling Controlled Unclassified
Information (CUI), Microsoft recommends using GCC High due to its superior
security and compliance features.
The same could be said for specific NIST
compliance frameworks such as 800-171 and 800-53. Both of these standards can
technically be met using all four versions of Microsoft 365, but the usage
of Microsoft 365
GCC High is usually recommended for better security
and more strict compliance.
On the other hand, DFARS 7012 compliance can
only be achieved using the GCC version or higher, although there was a time
when GCC High was the sole option for meeting this requirement. Given ITAR's
strict regulations on data and service location, Microsoft suggests that M365
GCC High is the minimum platform to ensure compliance.
However, it is not uncommon for specific
frameworks to require additional software in order to meet strict security
requirements of standards such as CMMC or NIST. For example, a Zero-Trust
approach can be used to secure file access within Microsoft 365 applications to
ensure secure collaboration with the usage of CUI and FCI while also
maintaining complete Microsoft 365 CMMC
compliance.
By implementing Attribute-Based Access Control
(ABAC) policies, which are a part of the Zero Trust security model, you can
enhance your control over sensitive data. ABAC policies evaluate various
attributes related to both data and users, instead of relying solely on user
roles, to determine access.
These policies assess attributes of files, like
their security classification and permissions, along with user attributes such
as security clearance, time of access, location, and device used. This
comprehensive evaluation helps determine who can access, edit, save, download,
print, and share files and when they can do so.
This approach provides government agencies and
defense suppliers with precise, real-time control over data access and usage.
It allows security adjustments in real-time based on specific conditions. If a
user's actions seem suspicious or don't align with the established parameters,
access can be denied, or limited access can be granted.
For instance, if an authenticated user tries to
access a sensitive file outside of business hours, using a personal device in a
different country, the system will deny access, effectively preventing a hacker
who might have stolen credentials from gaining entry. These kinds of security
measures allow for a much more secure approach to data without compromising the
collaborative aspect of this field of work.