ARTICLE

When Charity Is Labeled "Hate": Guidestar And The Southern Poverty Law Center

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org June 30, 2017
Share this article:

The culture war has a new front: philanthropic giving. That is, charity. And Christians, once again, are in the crosshairs.

Even if you've never heard of Guidestar, trust me, philanthropists are very familiar with the organization. 

Guidestar's stated mission is "To revolutionize philanthropy by providing information that advances transparency, enables users to make better decisions, and encourages charitable giving."

To that end, Guidestar gathers and provides information "about each nonprofit's mission, legitimacy, impact, reputation, finances, programs, transparency, governance, and so much more."

For two decades, Guidestar has provided a very valuable service to would-be donors. Recently, however that "so much more" part of their mission statement, temporarily turned the organization into a combatant in the culture wars.


Earlier this year, in addition to their usual financial information, Guidestar also included a banner at the top of the webpage telling potential donors that certain groups had been designated as "hate groups" by the Southern Poverty Law Center, or the SPLC.

Back in 1981 the SPLC started publishing a quarterly report listing groups that, in its words, "have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics."

For most of the next 36 years, the groups singled out were obvious racists ones, like the KKK or Nazis, or more subtle ones that the SPLC believed promoted white supremacy.

Then, as Ed Stetzer put it on "BreakPoint This Week," the SPLC's focus moved from civil rights to the sexual revolution. In 2010, it listed the Family Research Council as a hate group, and last year, added the Alliance Defending Freedom to the list.

Now calling the FRC a "hate group" is absurd. It doesn't attack or malign anyone, unless merely holding traditional Christian beliefs on marriage and sexuality somehow constitutes "maligning" or "attacking."


And if FRC's inclusion is absurd, ADF's is, as Chuck Colson liked to say, outrageous. For starters, ADF isn't even an advocacy group. It's a legal defense group, the kind of mirror image of the ACLU. 

If ADF's defense of Barronelle Stutzman constitutes attacking or maligning gays and lesbians, then why did the ACLU's defense of Nazis who wished to march in Skokie, Illinois, not constitute a maligning of the town's Jewish residents?

So I agree with the group of forty-one conservatives who, in a letter to Guidestar protested its use of SPLC designations, saying that "The 'hate group' list is nothing more than a political weapon targeting people [the SPLC] deems to be its political enemies."

And it isn't only conservatives who are critical of the SPLC. In 2009, left-wing journalist Alexander Cockburn, writing in The Nation, called the "Hate Group" designation a fundraising tool, designed to "[scare] dollars out of the pockets of trembling liberals aghast at his lurid depictions of hate-sodden America."

Now, the good news is that the controversy over including the designation resulted in Guidestar removing the offending information, as Guidestar put it, "for the time being."


The bad news is that Guidestar will continue to make "this information available to any user on request." In other words, it's still chosen to be a co-belligerent in the culture wars.

But this whole story makes clear that the belief that holding traditional Christian convictions about marriage and sexuality constitutes maligning or attacking others is still very much with us.

What's happened with Guidestar is a reminder that the battle for religious freedom won't only, or even primarily, be waged in the courts. 

That's not to say that the recent Supreme Court victory in the Trinity Lutheran case wasn't hugely important. Of course it was. 

But as Chuck Colson liked to say, influencing the culture, securing our freedoms, will take place over the backyard fence and at barbecues, and maybe even less likely places, like financial websites.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

October 29, 2026What Happens Next In Israel? Four Paths Out Of The Election Deadlock

Israel’s election has left the road to power fractured—and the clock may be ticking. Netanyahu and his rivals face four possible paths for...

October 29, 2026Why Are So Many Countries Urging Citizens To Stockpile Emergency Supplies?

What in the world is going on? Why are governments all over the planet suddenly encouraging their citizens to become preppers? Do they kno...

October 29, 2026"Boys and Girls" Out, "Comrades" In At A Megachurch's Children's Ministry

There are few places left in American life where children can reliably hear that they were made by God as male or female, and that this is...

October 29, 2026The Apartheid Smear Meets The Israeli Ballot Box

Israel just held an election in which Arab citizens turned out strongly and their votes counted. The Palestinian Authority has not held a ...

October 27, 2026A 90-Day Doomsday Plan? The Pentagon Prepares For Fortress America

What happens when war reaches America’s power grid, supply chains and military bases? The Pentagon is preparing for that possibility, with...

October 27, 2026The Battle For Israel’s Future: What To Watch In Tuesday’s Election

Israel’s election night could turn on parties hovering near a razor-thin threshold. Fall short, and their votes vanish; cross it, and a ha...

October 27, 2026When "Respect" Means Silence: Why Christians Should Watch Britain’s New Orders

Britain’s new Respect Orders promise to curb antisocial behavior—but their broad language raises serious questions for Christians. When pe...

Get Breaking News