ARTICLE

When Charity Is Labeled "Hate": Guidestar And The Southern Poverty Law Center

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org June 30, 2017
Share this article:

The culture war has a new front: philanthropic giving. That is, charity. And Christians, once again, are in the crosshairs.

Even if you've never heard of Guidestar, trust me, philanthropists are very familiar with the organization. 

Guidestar's stated mission is "To revolutionize philanthropy by providing information that advances transparency, enables users to make better decisions, and encourages charitable giving."

To that end, Guidestar gathers and provides information "about each nonprofit's mission, legitimacy, impact, reputation, finances, programs, transparency, governance, and so much more."

For two decades, Guidestar has provided a very valuable service to would-be donors. Recently, however that "so much more" part of their mission statement, temporarily turned the organization into a combatant in the culture wars.


Earlier this year, in addition to their usual financial information, Guidestar also included a banner at the top of the webpage telling potential donors that certain groups had been designated as "hate groups" by the Southern Poverty Law Center, or the SPLC.

Back in 1981 the SPLC started publishing a quarterly report listing groups that, in its words, "have beliefs or practices that attack or malign an entire class of people, typically for their immutable characteristics."

For most of the next 36 years, the groups singled out were obvious racists ones, like the KKK or Nazis, or more subtle ones that the SPLC believed promoted white supremacy.

Then, as Ed Stetzer put it on "BreakPoint This Week," the SPLC's focus moved from civil rights to the sexual revolution. In 2010, it listed the Family Research Council as a hate group, and last year, added the Alliance Defending Freedom to the list.

Now calling the FRC a "hate group" is absurd. It doesn't attack or malign anyone, unless merely holding traditional Christian beliefs on marriage and sexuality somehow constitutes "maligning" or "attacking."


And if FRC's inclusion is absurd, ADF's is, as Chuck Colson liked to say, outrageous. For starters, ADF isn't even an advocacy group. It's a legal defense group, the kind of mirror image of the ACLU. 

If ADF's defense of Barronelle Stutzman constitutes attacking or maligning gays and lesbians, then why did the ACLU's defense of Nazis who wished to march in Skokie, Illinois, not constitute a maligning of the town's Jewish residents?

So I agree with the group of forty-one conservatives who, in a letter to Guidestar protested its use of SPLC designations, saying that "The 'hate group' list is nothing more than a political weapon targeting people [the SPLC] deems to be its political enemies."

And it isn't only conservatives who are critical of the SPLC. In 2009, left-wing journalist Alexander Cockburn, writing in The Nation, called the "Hate Group" designation a fundraising tool, designed to "[scare] dollars out of the pockets of trembling liberals aghast at his lurid depictions of hate-sodden America."

Now, the good news is that the controversy over including the designation resulted in Guidestar removing the offending information, as Guidestar put it, "for the time being."


The bad news is that Guidestar will continue to make "this information available to any user on request." In other words, it's still chosen to be a co-belligerent in the culture wars.

But this whole story makes clear that the belief that holding traditional Christian convictions about marriage and sexuality constitutes maligning or attacking others is still very much with us.

What's happened with Guidestar is a reminder that the battle for religious freedom won't only, or even primarily, be waged in the courts. 

That's not to say that the recent Supreme Court victory in the Trinity Lutheran case wasn't hugely important. Of course it was. 

But as Chuck Colson liked to say, influencing the culture, securing our freedoms, will take place over the backyard fence and at barbecues, and maybe even less likely places, like financial websites.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

January 29, 2026Countdown To Conflict - Iran Threatens To Take Out US Aircraft Carrier

If the U.S. attacks Iran, the Iranians have already warned that the USS Abraham Lincoln will be a primary target. In fact, the Iranians ju...

January 29, 2026'Pick Your Baby': The Quiet Arrival Of Consumer Eugenics

"Pick your baby." Until recently, those words belonged to toy aisles and video games. Now they appear on subway walls in New York City--on...

January 29, 2026When Movement Requires Permission: The Quiet Rise Of The 15-Minute City

Unlike the Soviet Union's physical micro-districts, today's version doesn't require checkpoints or guards. The boundaries are digital. Inv...

January 29, 2026This Is What Modern War Looks Like - When Men Surrender To Machines

For thousands of years, battles were decided by who could march farther, fight harder, and endure longer. But a chilling new moment from t...

January 28, 2026Many Americans Are Pulling Back As They Sense An Economic Storm Brewing

Consumer confidence has fallen to levels not seen in more than a decade. That matters because confidence is what fuels everyday life. When...

January 28, 2026How Your News Source Completely Changes What You Believe About Immigration

Democracy requires a shared factual foundation. When half the country thinks we're in a humanitarian crisis and half thinks we're finally ...

January 28, 2026Canada Is Showing Us The True, Ugly Colors of Euthanasia

Canada's so-called Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program isn't just failing vulnerable people -- it's actively betraying them. Time a...

Get Breaking News