Saving NATO From Turkey

News Image By Daniel Pipes/ October 26, 2017
Share this article:

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, known as NATO, faces an existential problem.

No -- it's not about getting member states to fulfill agreed-upon spending on defense projects, nor finding a role after the Soviet collapse, or standing up to Russia's Vladimir Putin. 

Rather, it's Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the Islamist, dictatorial ruler of Turkey whose policies threaten to undermine this unique alliance of 29 states, which has lasted nearly 70 years.

Created in 1949, NATO's founding principles ambitiously set out the alliance's goal "to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilization of [member states'] peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law." In other words, the alliance exists to defend Western civilization.

For its first 42 years, until the USSR collapsed in 1991, this meant containing and defeating the countries of the Warsaw Pact. Today, it means containing and defeating Russia and Islamism. 

Of these latter two, Islamism is the deeper and longer-lasting threat --  because it's based not on a single leader's personality but on a highly potent ideology, one that effectively succeeded fascism and communism as the great radical utopian challenge to the West.

Some major figures in NATO appreciated this shift soon after the Soviet collapse. Already in 1995, Secretary-General Willy Claes noted with prescience that, "fundamentalism is at least as dangerous as communism was." With the Cold War over, he said, "Islamic militancy has emerged as perhaps the single gravest threat to the NATO alliance and to Western security."

In 2004, José María Aznar, Spain's former prime minister, warned that "Islamist terrorism is a new shared threat of a global nature that places the very existence of NATO's members at risk." He advocated that NATO focus on combating "Islamic jihadism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction," and called for "placing the war against Islamic jihadism at the center of the Allied strategy."

But, instead of a robust NATO leading the battle against Islamism, it was internally hobbled by Erdoğan's opposition. Rather than assert the fight against Islamism, the other 28 members of NATO dismayingly deferred to the Islamist within their ranks.

The 28 stay countries mum about the near-civil war that the Turkish regime waged in southeastern Anatolia against its own Kurdish citizens -- and the emergence of a private army (called SADAT) under Erdoğan's exclusive control seemed not to bother them.

Likewise, they also appear oblivious to Ankara's unpredictably limiting access to the NATO base at Incirlik; obstructed relations with friendly states such as Austria, Cyprus and Israel; and the vicious anti-Americanism symbolized by the mayor of Ankara hoping for more storm damage to be inflicted on the United States.

Similarly, Turkish mistreatment of citizens in other NATO countries goes unchallenged -- not the arrest of 12 Germans in Turkey, (such as Deniz Yücel and Peter Steudtner) nor the attempted assassination of Turks in Germany (such as Yüksel Koç). 

This also applies to the seizure of Americans in Turkey as hostages (such as Andrew Brunson and Serkan Gölge), and repeated physical violence against Americans in the United States (such as at the Brookings Institute and at Sheridan Circle).

NATO seems unfazed that Ankara helps Iran's nuclear program, develops Iranian oil fields and transfers Iranian arms to Hezbollah. Erdoğan's talk of joining the Moscow-Beijing dominated Shanghai Cooperation Organisation ruffles few feathers, as do joint exercises with the Russian and Chinese militaries. 

A Turkish purchase of a Russian missile defense system, the S-400, appears to be more an irritant than a deal-breaker. A mutual US-Turkish ban on visas fazed no one.

NATO faces a choice. It can -- hoping that Erdoğan is no more than a colicky episode and that Turkey will return to the West 00 continue with the present policy. Or it can deem NATO's utility too important to sacrifice to this speculative possibility, and take assertive steps to freeze the Republic of Turkey out of NATO activities until it again behaves like an ally. Those steps might include:

Removing nuclear weapons from Incirlik

Closing NATO's operations at Incirlik

Canceling arms sales, such as the F-35 aircraft

Excluding Turkish participation from weapons development

Not sharing intelligence

Not training Turkish soldiers or sailors

Rejecting Turkish personnel for NATO positions

A unified stance against Erdoğan's hostile dictatorship permits the grand NATO alliance to rediscover its noble purpose -- "to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilization" of its peoples. 

By confronting Islamism, NATO will again take up the mantle that it has let down of late, which is nothing less than defending Western civilization.

Originally published at - reposted with permission.

Other News

February 21, 2018Parents Under Fire Who Don't Support Transgender Transitioning

Parents who don't believe that their teenage children should undergo radical gender reassignment procedures are now at risk of having thei...

February 21, 2018Mike Pence Mocked For Listening To Jesus

Large segments of our population have become so anti-Christian that a committed believer like Pence is now vilified as a religious nutcase...

February 21, 2018History Lessons From Years Under Islamism

In Iran, my generation, the first after Islamism came to power, is called the Burnt Generation. Our generation earned this name for having...

February 21, 2018Israeli Knesset Caucus Celebrates 'Night To Honor Christian Allies'

The event, organized by the Knesset Christian Allies Caucus and the World Jewish Congress, paid tribute to Evangelical Christians who have...

February 20, 2018Sanhedrin Mints Coin With Images of Trump and Cyrus To Promote Rebuilding Temple

Proceeds from the sale of the coin will be used in reenactments of Temple services as well as in other educational and practical endeavors...

February 20, 2018Are Russia And Israel On A Collision Course Over Syria?

Suggestions in the Russian media point to a scenario in which Israeli involvement in Syria forces Russia to more openly declare a pro-Iran...

February 20, 2018Turkey, Iran Threaten To Overwhelm West With Refugees

To these Islamist republics, Muslim refugees are weapons of jihad, not victims....

Get Breaking News