ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

February 05, 2026Rehearsing Control: The WHO Practices For The 'Next Pandemic'

On the surface, preparedness sounds wise. But prudence becomes something far darker when preparation quietly shifts power away from nation...

February 05, 2026When Machines Begin To Imitate The Image Of God: Humanoid AI Is Coming

A humanoid robot unveiled recently in Shanghai is not merely another step forward in artificial intelligence - it is a signal flare for wh...

February 05, 2026A Generation Alone? Nearly Half of Women May Be Single And Child-Free by 2030

By 2030, nearly half of women between the ages of 25 and 44 are expected to be single and child-free. Not delayed. Not undecided. But livi...

February 05, 2026Christians In Canada Fight Back, Stalling Hate Speech Bill - For Now

For weeks, a quiet but determined movement has been building across Canada. It hasn't involved riots, burning streets, or angry mobs. Inst...

February 03, 2026California Is Shaking Again - Why The Next Big One Won't Just Stay In California

In recent weeks, seismic activity along the Pacific Ring of Fire--particularly along California's coastline and inland fault systems--has ...

February 03, 2026A Detransitioner's $2M Jury Verdict Threatens The Child Mutilation Pipeline

A recent jury verdict marks the first tremor in a building earthquake that may sever the transgender child mutilation pipeline, setting th...

February 03, 2026When 'Sinner' Becomes An Offensive Word In The Pulpit

An Episcopal pastor argues that Christians should move away from the word "sinner" because it makes people uncomfortable....

Get Breaking News