ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

November 05, 2026When Conservatives Need Someone To Blame, Is Israel Becoming The Target?

As conservatives search for someone to blame for devastating election losses, a troubling target is emerging: Israel. Influential voices o...

November 05, 2026The Democrats Won The Election - But Are Socialists Winning The Future?

Democrats may have won the election, but what is the future direction of the party? Socialists are gaining ground, younger voters are embr...

November 05, 2026The Bible Literacy Crisis: When Two-Thirds Of Churchgoers Don't Know God's Word

Imagine walking into church this Sunday, sitting through worship, listening to the sermon, and then being handed a basic Bible knowledge t...

November 05, 2026Abortion At The Ballot Box In 2026: 1 Win, 3 Losses

The continued success of abortion-related measures underscores the sobering reality that support for legal abortion remains substantial an...

November 04, 2026The Elections Are Over - But The Real Problem Was Never On The Ballot

Elections can change who governs a nation. They can change laws, policies, and the direction of government. But they cannot, by themselves...

November 04, 2026The Death Of Authentic Worship? AI-Generated Christian Music Tops The Charts

Welcome to a new era of Christian music, where the person singing about heaven may never have experienced grief, never attended church, ne...

November 04, 2026The Very Real "Grid Down" Scenario From Cyberattacks

Perhaps we should pay attention when GovAI tells us that a single AI cyberattack "could cut off power to 100 million people and cost the e...

Get Breaking News