ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

August 29, 2026When Even 9/11 Can't Be Called Terrorism: The Media's War On Moral Clarity

Nearly 25 years after hijacked passenger jets were deliberately flown into the World Trade Center and Pentagon, killing nearly 3,000 peopl...

August 29, 2026God Had A Wife? When Pastors Trade Scripture For Mysticism And Fables

Mysticism, interfaith spirituality, ancient paganism and speculative theories about the Bible are increasingly being blended into what is ...

August 29, 2026The Body Wasn't The Problem: Changing Children Physically Won't Heal Them

For years, one of the most powerful arguments for medically transitioning children has been that these treatments are necessary for their ...

August 29, 2026No Safe Haven: Why Israel Cannot Stop Hunting The October 7 Terrorists

More than two years after October 7, Israel is sending a message to the men who participated in the worst massacre of Jews since the Holoc...

August 27, 2026Blood Moon Over America: Sign Of The Times - Or Just Another Eclipse?

Thursday night, millions of Americans will look up to see the moon turn blood red against a world already shaken by war, disasters and gro...

August 27, 2026Can Technology Detect Who Bows to the Antichrist?

For generations, students of Bible prophecy have asked a fascinating question about Revelation 13:15. How could the Antichrist and False ...

August 27, 2026From Scripture To Queer Tarot-The United Methodist Church's Theological Collapse

The United Methodist Church has undergone a dramatic transformation - but one congregation reveals just how far that theological shift can...

Get Breaking News