ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

May 16, 2026King Charles Pushes Britain Further Toward A Fully Digital Society

Alarm bells rang across both Britain and the United States after King Charles III formally announced the U.K. government's push toward a n...

May 16, 2026Americans Are Getting Behind On Their Debts At A Very Frightening Pace

As the nation hurdles toward an historical record of $19 trillion in total household debt, Americans saw the highest rates of auto loan de...

May 16, 2026Welcome To Progressive Worship & The Gospel According To Abba

If church simply becomes another concert venue, another social activism hub or another entertainment experience, then why would anyone see...

May 16, 2026When AI Decides For Itself: The Growing Threat Of Rogue Digital Agents

Last month, a small but deeply unsettling incident sent shockwaves through the tech world after an AI coding assistant reportedly wiped ou...

May 15, 2026Xi Jinping's 'Thucydides Trap' Warning Is Really About American Decline

Google searches for the phrase "Thucydides Trap" surged after Chinese President Xi Jinping used the term during discussions surrounding hi...

May 15, 2026China Fears The One Thing It Cannot Control-The Explosive Growth Of Christianity

While diplomats shake hands and cameras flash, millions of Chinese believers continue to worship under surveillance, face imprisonment for...

May 15, 2026Why Do Progressive Churches Keep Hosting Drag Shows?

The debate is no longer simply about whether progressive churches want to "welcome" LGBT individuals. The deeper question now is why some ...

Get Breaking News