ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

September 05, 2026JD Vance Gives Himself A 7 Out Of 10 Chance Of Heaven - What Would You Say?

Vice President JD Vance was recently asked a question that has nothing to do with elections, economics or foreign policy. "On a scale of o...

September 05, 2026Playing God With The Weather: Are We Opening A Door We Can't Close?

For decades, mankind could influence weather only crudely and under very specific circumstances. Now drones, satellites, sensors, advanced...

September 05, 2026The Women Nobody Wants To Talk About In The Transgender Debate

Women's sports may have been where many people first noticed the conflict between biological sex and gender identity. Women's prisons demo...

September 05, 2026The Progressive Paradox: Fleeing Spain For Gaza

A gay couple in Spain recently went viral after declaring that if the conservative Vox party comes to power, they would leave the country ...

September 03, 2026Court Restricts Girl's Church Attendance Over Claims Of "Psychological Harm"

A troubling court ruling out of Maine should have Christians paying attention. The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has upheld an order giving...

September 02, 2026Hidden Beneath The Waves: The New Nuclear Threat From Russia And China

While much of the world is watching drones transform the battlefields of Ukraine and the Middle East, another military revolution is takin...

September 03, 2026More Than Entertainment: Who You Support Matters

For most people, buying a concert ticket or streaming a favorite song doesn't feel like a political act. You like the music, enjoy the art...

Get Breaking News