ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

August 24, 2026The Clock Is Ticking: Trump Wants To Wait - But Iran May Not

The most dangerous period in the conflict with Iran may not be determined by missiles, aircraft or troop movements. It may be determined b...

August 24, 2026The End Of Privacy: AI Glasses Turn Every Encounter Into Potential Content

For years, Americans have worried about surveillance cameras mounted on buildings, government facial-recognition systems and smartphones q...

August 24, 2026Why Do More Progressive Pastors Keep Running For Office?

Pastors, ministers and seminarians associated with progressive Christianity are increasingly running for political office -- and they are ...

August 24, 2026Nothing Has Changed: New Leaders, Same Ideology

Nearly three years after Hamas's October 7, 2023 massacre in Israel and following the devastating war in the Gaza Strip, one might have ex...

August 20, 2026When AI Becomes You: The Coming Age Of Digital Surrogates

What happens when AI stops merely assisting you and increasingly begins acting as you? Mark Zuckerberg describes a not so distant future w...

August 20, 2026Sharia And The Constitution: The Question Abdul El-Sayed Needs To Answer

What role does Sharia play when a politician who considers it an obligation before God is making laws for Americans who do not believe in ...

August 20, 2026The U.S. Faces A "Historic" Cattle Shortage

This is the smallest the national herd has been since 1951. Just think about that for a moment. This is an enormous problem because in 195...

Get Breaking News