ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

August 06, 2026America's First Muslim Senator? Islam's Growing Political Power

El-Sayed's victory represents the intersection of several increasingly powerful forces: Muslim political activism, democratic socialism, a...

August 06, 2026The Great Political Realignment: Left & Right At The Crossroads

America is entering a great political realignment. The Republican Party may split over what America First means after Trump. The Democrati...

August 06, 2026War Without Soldiers: The Robot Arms Race That Could Change Humanity Forever

If China and Russia are pursuing weaponized robots and autonomous military systems, can America afford to stand aside? That is the dilemma...

August 06, 2026Why Has John 14:6 Become So Offensive To Progressive Christianity?

In recent weeks, several pastors within the Presbyterian Church (USA) have publicly questioned, softened, or reinterpreted one of Jesus' c...

August 05, 2026Iran's End-Times Theology Is More Dangerous Than Its Missiles

The West tends to explain wars in terms of military strength, economics, diplomacy, and political ambition. Those factors certainly matter...

August 05, 2026Why Are Woke Christian Churches Obsessed With Drag Shows?

Over the past several years, a growing number of progressive churches have hosted drag story hours, Pride worship services and drag perfor...

August 05, 2026The New Orthodoxy: Why Biblical Truth Is Becoming A Career Liability

In a growing number of workplaces, schools, and professional settings, simply affirming what the Bible teaches about humanity may itself b...

Get Breaking News