ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

February 12, 2026Borrowed Futures: How Debt Is Replacing Hope In America

As long as you have hope, you can face whatever challenges are ahead. Sadly, Americans have been losing hope at a rate that is absolutely...

February 12, 2026Welcome To The 'EUSSR': Unpopular European Regimes Crack Down On Dissent

Governing elites in Europe have been growing ever more unpopular. So, if you are an unpopular regime desperately clinging to power, what d...

February 12, 2026Theological Liberalism Has Become A Dangerous Rival To Biblical Christianity

Theologian Al Mohler condemned Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear's (D) recent use of the Bible on "The View," presumably to explain why he ve...

February 12, 2026Why Gen Z 'Nones' Are Reconsidering Religion

The draw of religion is that it provides a firm source of virtue and belonging, focus, and a sense of permanence. That's what the Zoomers ...

February 11, 2026On The Brink - War Timeline Is Narrowing

While negotiations continue on paper, the military picture tells a more sobering story with all indications a deal must be reached soon or...

February 11, 2026Christian Unity At What Cost? New Ecumenical Push Challenges Proselytism

In a fractured world, unity is attractive. But unity without truth ultimately fractures the gospel itself. It does not require pretending...

February 11, 2026Corporations Finally Getting The Message As LGTB Agenda Falters

Gone are the days when businesses raced to contort their internal policies to the radical demands of the Corporate Equality Index. Now, th...

Get Breaking News