ARTICLE

It's Now Mandatory To Microchip Your Dog In The United Kingdom. Are Humans Next?

News Image By Joe Wright/Activist Post April 12, 2016
Share this article:

If it's such good idea, why must it be mandatory? The government in the United Kingdom has just claimed further ownership of your dog.


In a new law, the Crown has granted her subjects the privilege to own a dog but only if the beast is microchipped. That's right,  microchipping dogs is now mandatory throughout the United Kingdom.

It began as a voluntary option for monitoring your own pet, but now, dog owners in the U.K. have a just a few weeks to comply; if local authorities catch dogs without a microchip, owners face expensive fines.

BBC reports "Dog owners who have not had their pets microchipped could face a fine of up to £500, as a new law comes into force. All dogs in England, Scotland and Wales are now legally required to have been chipped by the time they are eight weeks old."

The reason given for the mandate is to "tackle reckless ownership and help save councils vast sums of taxpayers' cash looking after strays," according to Simon Blackburn, of the Local Government Association, as quoted by the BBC.

Forcing a mandatory microchip into a sentient being to save money on governing? This is a joke, right? Nope.


"Microchipping our dogs will not only reunite people with their lost or stolen pets, but also help to tackle the growing problem of strays roaming the streets and relieve the burden placed on animal charities and local authorities," Animal Welfare Minister George Eustice said, hoping to appeal to dog lovers.

Owning a domestic dog starts with buying a license from the authoritarians. Then mandatory vaccines and forced sterilization are required in some areas. Leashes and cages are also compulsory in many places. Now they demand a microchip!

It seems like the same path currently being used to domesticate humans. After they mandate everyone get vaccinated, how long before they force humans to get microchipped to help governments and taxpayers save money on security?

Orignally published at activistpost.com. Reposted with permission




Other News

April 07, 2026Bill Gates, Mexico, And the Global Push To Digitize Your Identity

The most dangerous systems of control are almost never introduced as tools of oppression. They are introduced as tools of progress. That i...

April 07, 2026King Charles Just Confirmed Fears Over The UK’s Drift Away From Christianity

At a time when Britain is morally fractured, spiritually confused, and increasingly detached from the faith that once anchored it, the hea...

April 07, 2026Canadian Woman With Back Pain Goes To ER, Gets Offered DEATH!

Be careful about reporting a pain, a physical problem, maybe even a broken nail, in one nation. You might get offered the help you need to...

April 07, 2026Pro-Israel Christians Are Now In The Crosshairs Of Europe's Rising Antisemitism

On Friday evening, a manhunt was launched in the Netherlands to track down suspects responsible for a bombing attack targeting Christians ...

April 06, 2026Drought, War, And Fertilizer: A Dangerous Recipe For Food Inflation

As summer approaches, a troubling convergence is taking shape -- one that should concern far more than farmers and ranchers....

April 06, 2026When The Woke Eat Their Own: Convention Melts Down Over Identity Politics

What should have been a serious gathering about leadership, economic direction, national priorities, and the concerns of ordinary Canadian...

April 06, 2026Leather, Legacy, And The Living Word: The Dilemma Of Luxury Bibles

The rise of $200, $300, and even $400 Bibles should at least make us pause--not because beauty is bad, but because motive matters....

Get Breaking News