ARTICLE

Genetic Engineering And Science Fiction Come To Life

News Image By Steve Schiller, Steel on Steel January 10, 2016
Share this article:

What do the words multiplex, made-to-order, and moratorium all have in common? If you said they all begin with 'm' youd be correct. But theres a deeper connection that blends together the worlds of genetic engineering and science fiction.

Genetic engineering has been made easier by the use of the CRISPR-Cas9 machine, an invention that can be used to insert, remove, and change DNA in any biological organism, including human embryos. This opens the scientific door to a plethora of opportunities to treat and prevent diseases.



But in the United States, UK, and China  the Big Three global leaders in gene manipulation  the question on the table is: should this be allowed? Members from the triad met in Washington DC in early December to discuss the ramifications and ethics of moving forward in this field of study. One might think that great strides and regulations had burst forth from this grand moratorium.

What actually happened is that the moratorium committee issued a statement urging the Big Three to take the lead in discussing the uses of genetic research, influencing policymakers, and formulating guidelines. It seems this moratorium was a cutting edge chance to kick the discussion can down the road a little farther.

The conference did succeed in airing many of the questions and concerns surrounding the new science of genetic manipulation.

What are some of these eyebrow raising issues?

The strangest, I think, is called multiplex parenting. In theory, technology could allow for any number of parents from three or more of either sex or just one to contribute DNA to create a baby. You could have three women and one man, two men and a woman, or even three men with no woman. Or one person  a "solo parent"  could be all thats needed.

I mentioned the words 'in theory' because this technique currently is most advanced only in mice. While not yet advanced enough for human embryos, scientists are working feverishly to one day make it possible.

Building on the belief that curing potential diseases will help push through the research, many scientists and professors admit that they have minimal knowledge of the long-term implications of multiplex reproduction. Some are using the cautious balanced approach of refusing to give up on a technology they fervently want to pursue by stating they will only proceed under controlled conditions if and when it is safe to do so.




Only time will tell how long that promise holds out.

Another concern consuming hours of debate has been the controversial topic of designer babies. Scientists have started the genetic editing clock with the all too familiar goal of eliminating diseases. Critics argue, though, that theres nothing to stop the rich and powerful from unloading ridiculous amounts of money to power up the CRISPR machine and give them the perfect baby.

A. Cecile J.W. Janssens, an epidemiology expert from Emory University, recently wrote a piece in Newsweek that plays down the possibility of designer babies, stating that due to the genetic nature of different traits, there is little if any opportunity to enhance babies genetically.

She also warns that trying to "cure" diseases at the embryonic level is dangerous. She states: "Not only could off-target cutsunintended edits in the wrong places of the DNAintroduce heritable errors, but mutations may... increase the risk of one disease while decreasing the risk of another."

George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard, however, has come out in support of genetic editing, writing that attempting to eradicate diseases is "unlikely to lead to unforeseen effects" and "would not be especially unsafe."

A myriad of scientists and experts can be found lining up on either side of this issue. Who do we believe? It appears there is a long road ahead before a decision is reached on whether we should proceed with the technology and if so, what the guidelines should be.





Other News

July 09, 2025From Japan To The U.S - Earthquake Fault Lines Are Awakening

Is there a possibility that a cataclysmic eruption of Mt. Rainier could occur in the not too distant future? On Tuesday morning, Mt. Rain...

July 09, 2025When The Left Wants Blood: The Quiet Slide Toward Political Violence

Democratic lawmakers are hearing increasingly violent rhetoric from their constituents-calls to "break the rules," "fight dirty," and stop...

July 09, 2025The Digital Trap: Europe's Quiet March Toward Total Control

Imagine a world where every transaction you make, every website you visit, every thought you dare to express online is silently recorded, ...

July 09, 2025Shepherds Without Scripture: What Do Today’s Pastors Really Believe?

One in four Mainline clergy doubt the existence of God. These aren't fringe bloggers or deconstructing TikTok influencers. These are the m...

July 07, 2025Hijacking Creation: Scientists May Only Be Years Away From Lab-Made Children

In-vitro gametogenesis - the creation of human sperm and eggs from skin or blood cells--is now just years away. Scientists across Japan, C...

July 07, 2025Death To The IDF? The Disturbing New Normal On The Progressive Left

Once reliably pro-Israel, the Democratic Party has undergone a dramatic reversal on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict-and no demographic re...

July 07, 2025Access Denied: How Age Rules Could Reshape The Internet For Everyone

If identity becomes the new key to the internet, then the next great digital debate won't be about content moderation-it will be about acc...

Get Breaking News