ARTICLE

Why the State Department Won't Acknowledge The Truth About Fatah

News Image By Stephen M. Flatow/JNS.org October 24, 2016
Share this article:

The U.S. State Department denounced the latest terrorist attack in Jerusalem by condemning "the statements glorifying this reprehensible and cowardly attack."

At first, it might seem like good news President Barack Obama's administration finally acknowledged and criticized the horrendous glorification of terrorist attacks we read about almost every day.

Until you notice the State Department forgot to mention one little thing--the identity of those it condemned. Who exactly has been making statements "glorifying" the attack? Who called the terrorist a hero and a martyr? Who defended and justified the murder of an Israeli Jewish grandmother?


The answer is Fatah, whose chairman is Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas.

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) created the PA in 1994 to govern territories from which Israel was withdrawing. Yasser Arafat, head of the PLO, was the first head of the PA. After he died, Abbas succeeded him.

The PLO consists of eight terrorist organizations, Fatah being the largest. Arafat was chairman of Fatah and the PLO. Following his death, Abbas become chairman of Fatah and the PLO. 

In other words, Abbas--hailed as a "moderate" by the Obama administration, the United Nations and the international news media--is chairman of the movement that is spearheading the glorification of the Jerusalem terrorist attack.

Within hours of the most recent Oct. 9 attack, Fatah's Facebook page featured a large, full-color cartoon depicting a hand with a machine gun waving from the top of Jerusalem's Dome of the Rock. 

On the ground below are two Israeli army helmets in a pool of blood. They represent Israeli police officer Yosef Kirme, 29 and the grandmother, Levanah Malichi, 60, murdered in the attack. Evidently, Fatah regards Israeli grandmothers as soldiers.

Fatah's Facebook page also featured an announcement praising "the shahid (martyr) Musbah Abu Sbeih, the one who carried out the operation." Abbas's Fatah uses the word "operation" when referring to terrorist attacks. 

That's because it doesn't consider murdering Israelis as terrorism. Palestinian Media Watch notes, "Defining a dead murderer as a shahid indicates that, according to Fatah, the murder of Israelis is sanctioned and even desired in the name of Islam."

The Fatah posting described the terrorist as "one of the most prominent people in Jerusalem and the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque." It said the charges Sbeih was recently convicted of in Israeli court constituted "ribat," an Islamic term referring to praiseworthy religious conflicts over Muslim land. The posting further justified his attack, claiming "the occupation authorities persecuted him."


Abbas's Fatah further justified the attack by falsely claiming, "The occupation government...is granting permission to the settlers to invade it, defile it, and desecrate its sanctity on a daily basis under the umbrella and protection of the occupation police."

False claims about Jews "defiling" other people's religious sites have been used throughout the ages to stir up anti-Jewish hatred and violence. It's called blood libel.

At the same time, the Jerusalem branch of Abbas's Fatah issued a call to Arab shopkeepers to go on strike "in memory of the souls of the martyrs of Palestine and this morning's martyr." The PA's official Voice of Palestine Radio broadcast called for the strike "due to the death of the Shahid Abu Sbeih."

So why won't the Obama administration acknowledge the truth about what Abbas's Fatah is doing? Why won't it refer to Abbas and Fatah by name? Because here's what would happen.

Obama would have to put Fatah back on the U.S. list of terrorist groups. (Supporting and encouraging terrorism is one of the criteria for getting on the list.) He would have to stop giving Abbas $500 million each year, since it's against the law to give U.S. funds to terrorist groups. 

And Obama would have to give up his dream of forcing Israel to permit the creation of a Palestinian state led by Abbas, Fatah and the PA.

Obama's political agenda--his entire policy concerning Israel and the Palestinian Arabs--conflicts with telling the truth about Fatah.

No matter how loudly Abbas's Fatah cheers for terrorists, the Obama administration will never do more than make vague allusions to "the statements glorifying this reprehensible and cowardly attack," without ever identifying who is doing the glorifying.

Originally published at JNS.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

February 18, 2026Glitter Ash Sacrilege: Progressive Church Mocks Ash Wednesday With LGBTQ Ritual

By offering glitter ashes alongside traditional ashes, the church presents two competing visions of Christianity: one grounded in repentan...

February 18, 2026America's Fiscal Time Bomb Is Ticking-And It's Set to Explode In Your Lifetime

The United States is speeding toward a debt crisis that will not be theoretical, political, or abstract. It will be personal. And when it ...

February 18, 2026Trans Violence Is Escalating-Political Correctness Wants To Ignore It

Across America and Canada, shocking acts of violence continue to be committed by individuals identifying as transgender or gender-fluid, y...

February 18, 2026Chilling New Tactic: Anti-Zionists To Target Jewish Kids Camps

Imagine opening your email as a parent and discovering that activists are organizing a campaign against your child's summer camp--not beca...

February 17, 202610 Years In Prison For Sharing Social Media Post Critical Of Transgenderism?

It sounds like something torn from the pages of dystopian fiction: a courtroom, a judge, and a citizen facing years behind bars--not for v...

February 17, 2026Meta's Face-Scanning Glasses Could Turn Everyday Life Into A Surveillance Grid

There are moments in technological history when a single product proposal reveals far more than a roadmap--it exposes a philosophy. The la...

February 17, 2026The Collapse Of Legacy Media And The Rise Of Alternative Voices

For decades, legacy media institutions held an almost sacred place in American civic life. Anchors were trusted voices. Newspapers were ar...

Get Breaking News