The UN Wants The Keys To AI - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Artificial intelligence may become the most powerful information technology humanity has ever created. It will increasingly determine what people read, what children learn, how governments operate and, perhaps most importantly, what billions of people believe to be true.

So there is a question just as important as what AI will eventually be capable of doing:

Who gets to make the rules?

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres wants the UN to play a major role in answering that question. The organization has launched a Global Dialogue on AI Governance, created an international scientific panel on AI and is pushing countries toward greater cooperation over how this technology should be controlled.

AI certainly presents enormous risks. But before giving an international institution greater influence over the rules governing the world's most powerful technology, perhaps we should examine the institution asking for the keys.

The UN's Global Digital Compact explicitly calls for enhanced “international governance of artificial intelligence” and says the United Nations has “an important role to play in shaping, enabling and supporting” that governance.

The architecture is already taking shape: scientific panels, global dialogues, international cooperation and interoperable standards.

Each sounds harmless enough by itself.

Together, however, they create something much more significant — an international framework capable of influencing how governments regulate a technology that could eventually mediate much of humanity's access to information.

And information is where this becomes especially dangerous.

The Global Digital Compact doesn't stop with dangerous AI systems. It also addresses “information integrity,” misinformation, disinformation and hate speech while promoting international cooperation over how these issues should be handled.

That raises an enormous question:

Who determines what constitutes misinformation?

Increasingly, people won't search ten websites and compare competing arguments. They'll ask an AI assistant a question and receive one synthesized answer.

What caused this war? Was this election fair? What does the Bible teach about sexuality? Is this medical treatment safe? Is this religious belief hateful? Who has the historical claim to Jerusalem?

AI won't simply locate information. It will select, summarize, interpret and prioritize it.

Control the standards governing AI and you potentially influence the gatekeeper through which billions of people understand the world.

For Christians and supporters of Israel, the UN's record should immediately raise concerns.

Israel has faced extraordinary scrutiny throughout the UN system. The advocacy organization UN Watch counted 15 General Assembly resolutions concerning Israel in 2025 compared with 11 concerning all other countries combined.

Then came the UNRWA scandal. A UN investigation examined allegations involving 19 employees following October 7 and ultimately concluded that evidence concerning nine indicated they “may have been involved” in the attacks. Those employees were fired.

Now imagine similar institutional judgments filtering into artificial intelligence.

Who determines how AI describes Jerusalem?

Who defines “occupation,” “terrorism,” “resistance,” “settlements” or “genocide”?

Who determines whether Israel's biblical and historical connection to the land is legitimate history or religious mythology?

Today's diplomatic battles could become tomorrow's algorithmic assumptions.

And unlike a UN resolution that most Americans will never read, an AI-generated answer could reach hundreds of millions of people.

The COVID era provided another lesson about concentrating authority in international institutions.

The Independent Panel for Pandemic Preparedness and Response concluded that serious failures occurred across the international system and national governments during the opening stages of COVID, famously describing February 2020 as a “lost month.”

International institutions are run by people. They can be slow. They can succumb to political pressures. They can get things wrong.

Yet during a crisis, their conclusions can quickly acquire enormous authority.

Now imagine those judgments incorporated into AI systems answering billions of questions every day.

A mistaken press conference eventually disappears.

An assumption embedded throughout an AI information ecosystem can reproduce itself endlessly.

The most consequential change could happen gradually.

International dialogue becomes scientific panels. Panels develop principles. Principles become standards. Standards become regulatory expectations. Governments incorporate them into national laws. Technology companies modify their systems to comply across hundreds of jurisdictions.

Eventually, rules that began as international recommendations can become difficult for ordinary people or companies to escape.

The Global Digital Compact openly promotes cooperation to make AI governance frameworks more compatible and encourages interoperable international standards.

No secret meetings are required.

The framework is being discussed and assembled in public.

Previous generations worried about governments controlling newspapers, radio stations and television networks.

AI changes the scale entirely.

Imagine a generation that rarely reads primary documents or visits individual news organizations. People simply ask their AI what happened.

AI explains history. Summarizes news. Teaches children. Answers religious questions. Recommends financial decisions. Determines which sources appear credible.

Soon AI agents may conduct transactions, interact with governments and manage parts of people's digital lives.

Whoever substantially influences the rules governing those systems possesses something far more consequential than traditional media influence.

They influence the gatekeeper itself.

Revelation 13 describes a future system of extraordinary centralized power under the Antichrist, eventually reaching into something as basic as whether individuals can “buy or sell.”

For nearly 2,000 years, such worldwide control would have been practically impossible.

Not anymore.

Digital identity, biometric authentication, programmable digital currencies, mass surveillance, interconnected databases and artificial intelligence are creating capabilities ancient empires could never have imagined.

AI could become the connective tissue holding much of it together — identifying individuals, analyzing behavior, detecting prohibited activity, processing transactions, monitoring communications and determining access to digital systems at extraordinary scale.

Now place those technologies alongside the growing push for international governance.

The Bible describes a final period in which political authority, economic control and spiritual rebellion converge under one ruler. Our generation is constructing technologies capable of enabling levels of centralized control that previous generations could scarcely comprehend.

That should make Christians pay very close attention when the world's most powerful technology begins converging with increasingly ambitious systems of global governance.

The UN wants a greater role in governing AI.

But the deeper question is where this road eventually leads.

Because humanity is rapidly building an AI infrastructure powerful enough that whoever ultimately controls it could exercise a degree of influence over information, identity and economic participation unlike anything the world has ever seen.

And Scripture has already warned us that one day, someone will.