ARTICLE

Biden's Pledge To Restore US Funding To Palestinians Called 'Mental Incoherence'

News Image By Jackson Richman/JNS.org September 07, 2020
Share this article:

A Republican member of Congress has slammed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden for pledging to restore U.S. funding to the Palestinians in accordance with the Taylor Force Act, calling Biden's pledge a display of "mental incoherence."

"You can't restore funding to the Palestinians and comply with the Taylor Force Act except for some very, very limited humanitarian types of funding," Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) told JNS in a recent interview.

"Basically, if you agree with the sentiment behind the Taylor Force Act, you don't restore funding to the Palestinians."

"I think Joe Biden is showing some mental incoherence when he says something like that," he said.


Lamborn introduced a version of the Taylor Force Act in 2017 and a version of it passed Congress and became law in March 2018, cutting off virtually all U.S. funding to the Palestinian Authority due to it financially rewarding terrorists and their families. 

It requires the secretary of state to verify that the P.A. has taken certain steps to stop such activity in addition to other requirements.

Lamborn warned that a Biden administration could try to certify that the P.A. is taking those concrete steps against rewarding terrorism, even if Ramallah isn't actually doing so.

"There might be people out there in a Biden administration who would try to do that," he said. "We would have to be diligent to watch over them and get oversight in trying to permit them from doing something that would be dishonest like that."

In addition to the P.A., the Trump administration cut other U.S. funding to the Palestinians, such as to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which the Biden campaign has said it would restore.


"A Biden-Harris administration will resume assistance that Trump has ended or curtailed," a Biden campaign spokesperson told JNS.

Lamborn called the Biden campaign's pledge to restore U.S. funding to UNRWA "unfortunate" in that UNRWA is a "force for negative results rather than a force for positive results." UNRWA has been accused of fostering anti-Israel sentiment and promoting Palestinian violence against Israel through textbooks.

'I'm interested in getting results'

The congressman also reiterated his call for U.S. President Donald Trump to cut off all ties to the P.A.

"The Palestinian Authority has been, unfortunately, not been a partner for reasonable and legitimate discussions, so I think the Trump administration had no choice but to sever ties," he said, in reference to the Palestinian Authority cutting off virtually all ties with Washington in December after Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital, where five months later the U.S. embassy was relocated to from Tel Aviv.

In July 2018, along with Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), Lamborn called on the U.S. Treasury Department to blacklist Issa Karake, the head of the Palestine Liberation Organization's commission of prisoners, which is responsible for facilitating the payments to terrorists or their families.

This past July, Lamborn wrote a letter to Trump, calling on him to designate the P.A.'s Commission of Prisoners' Affairs and its director, Qadri Abu Bakr, as sponsors of terror because of their direct involvement in the monthly payments to terrorists and their families.

Lamborn said the administration has yet to respond to the letter regarding Bakr.


In response to whether the United States should designate the P.A. as a terror group, Lamborn said it's "not something that I've looked at lately."

Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestine Liberation Front, Palestine Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine are U.S.-designated terrorist groups.

When asked why only target Bakr and not also other Palestinian officials, such as P.A. leader Mahmoud Abbas and PLO Secretary-General Saeb Erekat, Lamborn replied, "The incremental approach usually is more feasible, and I'm interested in getting results, not making a statement."

"If something is too widely dispersed and is too much of an ask, then it's not going to get anywhere," he said.

However, Lamborn didn't rule out the possibility of calling for designating the aforementioned Palestinian leaders.

"Maybe that'll be the next step," he said, adding that he "just decided" to start with targeting Bakr.

Originally published at JNS.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

September 21, 2026The UN Wants The Keys To AI - What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

There is a question just as important as what AI will eventually be capable of doing: Who gets to make the rules? United Nations Secretary...

September 21, 2026The Church Of England's Collapse Is Happening In Plain Sight

Britain's most senior Christian leader presents an award for “reconciliation and interfaith cooperation” to a Muslim cleric who once propo...

September 21, 2026The Israel Fault Line: Dividing Christians And Jews From Within

For evangelical Christians accustomed to thinking of Israel as a defining biblical and political issue, continued Jewish support for Democ...

September 21, 2026When The Patient Cannot Say Yes: The Next Frontier Of Euthanasia

The question is no longer simply whether someone has a "right to die." It is whether someone else has the right to decide that you should ...

September 18, 2026The Winter Fuel Crisis Is Building - And America Won't Be Immune

Fuel protests, rationing and shortages are already erupting overseas. Now diesel has crossed $6 a gallon in America, heating bills are pro...

September 18, 2026Netflix's Narnia Has A New Aslan - And Christians Are Not Happy

For generations, Christians have understood Aslan as C.S. Lewis’s unmistakably male representation of Christ. Now Netflix’s new Narnia ada...

September 18, 2026A Different Gospel Requires Different Saints

A developing strain of progressive Christian culture has explicitly begun treating LGBT historical figures as saints, martyrs and spiritua...

Get Breaking News