ARTICLE

Biden's Pledge To Restore US Funding To Palestinians Called 'Mental Incoherence'

News Image By Jackson Richman/JNS.org September 07, 2020
Share this article:

A Republican member of Congress has slammed Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden for pledging to restore U.S. funding to the Palestinians in accordance with the Taylor Force Act, calling Biden's pledge a display of "mental incoherence."

"You can't restore funding to the Palestinians and comply with the Taylor Force Act except for some very, very limited humanitarian types of funding," Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) told JNS in a recent interview.

"Basically, if you agree with the sentiment behind the Taylor Force Act, you don't restore funding to the Palestinians."

"I think Joe Biden is showing some mental incoherence when he says something like that," he said.


Lamborn introduced a version of the Taylor Force Act in 2017 and a version of it passed Congress and became law in March 2018, cutting off virtually all U.S. funding to the Palestinian Authority due to it financially rewarding terrorists and their families. 

It requires the secretary of state to verify that the P.A. has taken certain steps to stop such activity in addition to other requirements.

Lamborn warned that a Biden administration could try to certify that the P.A. is taking those concrete steps against rewarding terrorism, even if Ramallah isn't actually doing so.

"There might be people out there in a Biden administration who would try to do that," he said. "We would have to be diligent to watch over them and get oversight in trying to permit them from doing something that would be dishonest like that."

In addition to the P.A., the Trump administration cut other U.S. funding to the Palestinians, such as to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which the Biden campaign has said it would restore.


"A Biden-Harris administration will resume assistance that Trump has ended or curtailed," a Biden campaign spokesperson told JNS.

Lamborn called the Biden campaign's pledge to restore U.S. funding to UNRWA "unfortunate" in that UNRWA is a "force for negative results rather than a force for positive results." UNRWA has been accused of fostering anti-Israel sentiment and promoting Palestinian violence against Israel through textbooks.

'I'm interested in getting results'

The congressman also reiterated his call for U.S. President Donald Trump to cut off all ties to the P.A.

"The Palestinian Authority has been, unfortunately, not been a partner for reasonable and legitimate discussions, so I think the Trump administration had no choice but to sever ties," he said, in reference to the Palestinian Authority cutting off virtually all ties with Washington in December after Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital, where five months later the U.S. embassy was relocated to from Tel Aviv.

In July 2018, along with Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), Lamborn called on the U.S. Treasury Department to blacklist Issa Karake, the head of the Palestine Liberation Organization's commission of prisoners, which is responsible for facilitating the payments to terrorists or their families.

This past July, Lamborn wrote a letter to Trump, calling on him to designate the P.A.'s Commission of Prisoners' Affairs and its director, Qadri Abu Bakr, as sponsors of terror because of their direct involvement in the monthly payments to terrorists and their families.

Lamborn said the administration has yet to respond to the letter regarding Bakr.


In response to whether the United States should designate the P.A. as a terror group, Lamborn said it's "not something that I've looked at lately."

Hamas, Hezbollah, the Palestine Liberation Front, Palestine Islamic Jihad and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine are U.S.-designated terrorist groups.

When asked why only target Bakr and not also other Palestinian officials, such as P.A. leader Mahmoud Abbas and PLO Secretary-General Saeb Erekat, Lamborn replied, "The incremental approach usually is more feasible, and I'm interested in getting results, not making a statement."

"If something is too widely dispersed and is too much of an ask, then it's not going to get anywhere," he said.

However, Lamborn didn't rule out the possibility of calling for designating the aforementioned Palestinian leaders.

"Maybe that'll be the next step," he said, adding that he "just decided" to start with targeting Bakr.

Originally published at JNS.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

March 21, 2026Are We On The Brink Of A Major Escalation In Our War With Iran?

Instead of backing down, it appears that both sides are preparing to take the showdown in the Middle East to the next level....

March 21, 2026Experts Warn of Homegrown Jihadism And Spread Of Sharia Law

As terrorist attacks perpetrated by Islamist extremists continue to proliferate across the U.S., experts and lawmakers are raising the ala...

March 21, 2026Unthinkable: Britain Advances Law For Abortion Up To Birth

This week, the House of Lords advanced legislation that pro-life leaders are calling not just controversial, but catastrophic. Once a soc...

March 21, 2026Homeschool Divide: Some States Are Advancing Freedom - Others Are Pulling Back

Currently, New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Rhode Island have the highest level of regulations on homeschooling in the country w...

March 19, 2026The Silence In The Pulpit: When Pastors Stop Preaching On Bible Prophecy

Across much of the modern church landscape, a curious silence has settled over the pulpit. It is not the silence of reverence or reflectio...

March 19, 2026The New Middle East Battlefield: Energy Infrastructure

Both sides in this war are now specifically targeting oil and gas infrastructure, and that is going to have devastating consequences. Even...

March 19, 2026Iran's Islamic Crescent May Be Over But Guess Who Is Waiting In The Wings

While it is safe to say Iran's intended Caliphate is now a passing dream, the ideological void will doubtless be filled by Turkey, which s...

Get Breaking News