They've Already Tried To Rewrite America-Now They're Rewriting Jesus

There was a time when history mattered.

Today, history is treated like wet clay--something to be molded into whatever shape best serves the political cause of the moment. Statues are toppled. Founding Fathers are recast as villains. National histories are rewritten through ideological lenses.

Now, even Jesus Christ isn't off limits.

The latest attempt comes from the orbit of New York City's socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani. Reports indicate that his wife, Rama Duwaji, is co-hosting a luxury spiritual retreat in Corsica where attendees--paying as much as $5,000--will meditate on Mary as a "Palestinian woman giving birth under occupation."

It's difficult to know where to begin.

This isn't creative theology.

It isn't historical scholarship.

It isn't even remotely true.

It is political propaganda dressed in religious language.

And it represents yet another effort to hijack Christianity in service of a modern ideological movement.

This didn't begin with Zohran Mamdani's wife.

For years progressive activists, celebrity pastors, academics, and social media influencers have repeated variations of the same claim.

"Jesus was Palestinian."

"Jesus was the first Palestinian refugee."

"Jesus was a victim of Israeli occupation."

Christmas after Christmas we've watched churches display nativity scenes draped in Palestinian flags. During every major Israel-Hamas conflict, social media fills with graphics insisting that Jesus was somehow Palestinian.

The narrative is always the same.

If activists can convince Christians that Jesus was Palestinian rather than Jewish, they can subtly reshape how believers think about Israel, biblical prophecy, and today's Middle East.

It is one of the most successful examples of historical revisionism in recent years because it sounds compassionate while quietly rewriting nearly every historical fact surrounding Christ's birth.

Here's the inconvenient problem.

Palestine didn't exist.

Not as a nation.

Not as a people group.

Not as an ethnicity.

Not in the first century.

Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea.

Mary was Jewish.

Joseph was Jewish.

Their relatives were Jewish.

Their Scriptures were Jewish.

Their Temple was Jewish.

Their festivals were Jewish.

Their genealogy was Jewish.

The Gospels go to extraordinary lengths to establish Jesus' Jewish ancestry because it fulfilled hundreds of Old Testament prophecies concerning Israel's Messiah.

The very opening chapter of Matthew exists for that reason.

Luke traces His lineage for the same reason.

Paul repeatedly identifies Jesus as the promised descendant of David.

The writer of Hebrews identifies Him as coming from the tribe of Judah.

This isn't a minor detail.

It is central to the entire Gospel.

The name "Palestine" itself wasn't applied to Judea until roughly a century after Christ's death, when Emperor Hadrian renamed the province "Syria Palaestina" following the Bar Kokhba revolt in an effort to erase the Jewish identity of the land.

Ironically, the people claiming Jesus was Palestinian are borrowing a name created by pagan Rome to diminish Israel.

This is about far more than semantics.

If Jesus is no longer understood as Israel's Jewish Messiah, then the biblical story itself begins to unravel.

God's covenant with Abraham becomes blurred.

The promises to David lose their context.

Messianic prophecy becomes detached from Israel.

The unique role of the Jewish people in redemptive history fades into the background.

Once that foundation is removed, replacing biblical theology with modern political activism becomes much easier.

This isn't merely historical revision.

It's theological revision.

The irony becomes even more striking when viewed through the lens of Islam.

Muslims do honor Mary--Maryam--as one of the greatest women who ever lived.

She is the only woman mentioned by name throughout the Quran.

But Islam does not teach the same Mary Christians believe in.

Christians believe Mary gave birth to God incarnate--the eternal Son of God who died on the cross for the sins of the world and rose bodily from the grave.

Islam explicitly rejects every one of those central truths.

Jesus (Isa) is regarded only as a prophet.

He is not the Son of God.

His crucifixion is denied or radically reinterpreted.

His resurrection--the very heart of Christianity--is rejected.

So while Mary is honored in Islam, she exists within an entirely different theological framework.

The retreat's messaging attempts to merge Christianity, Islamic reverence for Mary, and modern Palestinian nationalism into one emotionally compelling narrative.

The result isn't biblical.

It isn't Islamic.

It isn't historical.

It's ideological.

Perhaps the most alarming part of all this is how easily so many people accept it.

Most Christians know very little about Jewish history.

Many couldn't explain why Matthew begins with a genealogy or why Luke carefully documents Christ's ancestry.

That biblical illiteracy creates fertile ground for political myths.

If people don't know Scripture, almost any story can be inserted into it.

That's exactly what we're witnessing.

Jesus becomes whatever modern activists need Him to be.

A socialist.

A revolutionary.

A refugee.

A Palestinian.

Anything--except the Jewish Messiah Scripture actually presents.

This debate isn't really about Mary.

It's about authority.

Will Christians allow twenty-first century political activists to redefine biblical history?

Or will we allow Scripture--and history--to speak for themselves?

Mary was not a Palestinian woman giving birth under occupation.

She was a Jewish virgin from Nazareth, chosen by God to bear the promised Messiah exactly as the prophets foretold centuries in advance.

That isn't merely a historical detail.

It is one of the pillars upon which the Gospel itself stands.

When a culture starts rewriting history, it won't stop with kings, presidents, or civilizations.

Eventually, it comes for Christ Himself.

And that is exactly what we're watching happen.