ARTICLE

New Zealand's Outrageous New Abortion Law

News Image By John Stonestreet/Breakpoint.org July 22, 2020
Share this article:

You'd think that a global pandemic that's killed hundreds of thousands would at least temper the advance of legal killing. It hasn't.

While headlines worldwide were praising New Zealand's prime minister for her handling of COVID-19, she was working to pass what might be described as the most extreme abortion laws on the planet.

In late March, New Zealand's parliament voted, in the words of the New York Times, to "loosen" the nation's abortion laws, particularly in the latter half of pregnancy when babies become viable outside of the womb. "Loosen" may be the understatement of the decade.


New Zealand's "loosened" laws now allow abortion on-demand, up to the moment of birth, for essentially any reason. That means sex-selective and disability-selective abortions, including for conditions like cleft lip and Down syndrome. 

The "loosening" happened despite the protests of over 1,200 New Zealanders with Down syndrome and their families, who called on Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern to keep her campaign promise not to allow this kind of deadly discrimination.

Even more horrific still, New Zealand's new law includes no requirement that babies born alive after botched abortions be given medical support. This was no accident. Prime Minister Ardern was herself among the loudest voices resisting any attempt to add protections for babies born alive.

According to the New York Times article, "public opinion surveys show that most New Zealanders" favored liberalizing their country's abortion laws. However, independent polling shows that the vast majority oppose specific features in this law. 

For instance, just 2 percent of Kiwi women support abortion on-demand up to birth. 93 percent oppose sex-selective abortion, in which a child is killed for no other reason than his or her sex. And, 94 percent of women polled support longstanding legal standards for New Zealand's abortion providers. In other words, they didn't want them relaxed at all. 


Perhaps the unpopularity of abortion-on-demand-for-any-reason-whatsoever is why pro-abortion politicians in New Zealand felt the need to rush through this legislation while everyone was distracted by a global pandemic. 

According to RightToLife.org, as the bill went through successive readings in Parliament, it lost support. In fact, the Abortion Legislation Committee heard from only 139 of the over 25,000 people who submitted public comments on the bill. For perspective, 1,500 people were allowed to speak on a recent climate change bill that received less than half as many submissions.

By taking advantage of the few people paying attention and by ignoring those who were, New Zealand's government has now enacted the most extreme abortion law in the democratic world.

As a spokesperson for New Zealand's Voice for Life described, "Our Parliament has a duty of care to consider the wellbeing and protection of all New Zealanders, including the vulnerable...they failed in that basic duty of care by passing this extreme Bill, but the hundreds of thousands of voters who opposed this Bill will not forget this failure when it is time to vote in the General Election in a few short months."

I hope this spokesperson is right. I know several prominent pro-life spokespersons in New Zealand who care deeply about the unborn, and who mourn this evil law. I also know how entrenched and relentless pro-abortion advocates can be, and how effective they are in passing increasingly extreme legislation. We've certainly witnessed as much in this country, most memorably in New York, where legislators applauded and lit the One World Trade Center in pink to celebrate.


Bad laws are built on bad ideas, and bad ideas have victims. The precious and unique lives made in God's image which will now be legally targeted is a stain on one of the world's most naturally beautiful and culturally enjoyable nations. 

I join so many of my friends in New Zealand who hope and pray that this law will prove a step too far, betraying an abortion movement opposed not just by champions of life, but by growing scientific knowledge, by growing compassion for children with disabilities, by the amazing medical breakthroughs in life-saving technologies, and by the unshakeable truth that unborn persons are fully human and worthy of life.

Pro-lifers have a lot of work to do; not just here but around the world. May God strengthen our hands, our hearts, and our voices to stay at the task.

Originally published at Breakpoint.org - reposted with permission.




Other News

November 05, 2025When Politicians Talk About Demons: The Rising Debate Over UFOs

In recent months, public fascination with UFOs and extraterrestrials has taken an unexpected turn--from late-night talk shows to the halls...

November 05, 2025A Welcome Correction: Vatican Backs Away From Mary’s Role In Salvation

In a new doctrinal decree approved by Pope Leo, the Vatican officially instructed Catholics not to refer to Mary as the "co-redeemer" of h...

November 05, 2025If This Canadian Liberal MP Gets The Chance, He's Coming For Your Bibles

Liberal Member of Parliament Marc Miller is the chair of the House Justice Committee, and last week he wondered whether Canada's Criminal ...

November 05, 2025Hezbollah Seeks To Take Over Lebanon Politically As It Rearms Against Israel

Hezbollah is pursuing a political strategy to take over the Lebanese parliament, and the Lebanese state is largely helpless in stopping it...

November 04, 2025America's Economic Fault Line - The Five Cracks That Could Reshape Everything

While everyone’s attention is fixed on the government impasse over the budget and food stamp funding, there’s a much deeper issue brewing ...

November 04, 2025The Trojan Horse Of Age Verification: From Safety To Surveillance & Control

The idea sounds innocent enough-protect children online. Who could possibly argue with that? Age verification tools, after all, promise to...

November 04, 2025'Dear Hockey: Goodbye' - Another Female Athlete Stands Up Against Transgenderism

After 20 years of professional hockey, Rachel Stoneberg is quitting -- not because she wanted to retire, but because she refuses to compet...

Get Breaking News